Undermind Research Topic: I want to find empirical papers comparing the completeness and accuracy of metadata in OpenAlex with that in other citation indexes or scholarly data sources, specifically focusing on the availability or correctness of references, citations, affiliations, and abstracts.

Research topic

I want to find empirical papers comparing the completeness and accuracy of metadata in OpenAlex with that in other citation indexes or scholarly data sources, specifically focusing on the availability or correctness of references, citations, affiliations, and abstracts.

Report

Here is a categorization of the references based on their relevance and content concerning the comparison of metadata completeness and accuracy of OpenAlex with other citation indexes:

Empirical Comparisons of Metadata Completeness and Accuracy

Focus on direct empirical comparisons between OpenAlex and other databases (like Scopus and Web of Science) regarding references, citations, affiliations, and abstracts.
References: [1, 2, 3]
Details: [1] examines coverage for African publications, revealing weaknesses in affiliations and references; [2] compares reference counts and abstracts, highlighting discrepancies in metadata; [3] evaluates OpenAlex's suitability for bibliometrics, noting discrepancies in references and affiliation data.

General Metadata Completeness Across Databases

Studies assessing metadata completeness in multiple scholarly databases, including OpenAlex, without specific focus on references, citations, or affiliations.
References: [6, 7, 8]
Details: [6] analyzes metadata completeness across eight databases, noting OpenAlex’s quality; [7, 8] discuss OpenAlex’s abstract completeness and general bibliographic data integration.

Thematic/Specialized Comparison

Focus on specific metadata elements, such as linguistic coverage or migration events, which may touch on OpenAlex but do not comprehensively compare metadata completeness and accuracy.
References: [4, 5, 10]
Details: [4] uses OpenAlex data for missing citation detection in WoS; [5] compares scholar migration tracking via author affiliations, noting higher precision in Scopus; [10] examines linguistic representation in OpenAlex compared to WoS.

Technical Methods and Data Retrieval Processes

Discusses technical methodologies for data retrieval and handling but does not focus on empirical metadata completeness comparisons.
References: [12]
Details: [12] details API usage for data retrieval from OpenAlex and Scopus, emphasizing process over comparative analysis of metadata elements.

Background and Contextual Studies

Provides contextual background on OpenAlex and its integration or historical data aspects, without a direct current comparison with other citation indexes regarding metadata elements.
References: [11, 9]
Details: [11] compares OpenAlex with Microsoft Academic Graph's legacy; [9] compares document types without focusing on core metadata completeness.

These categories and references together give an overview of the current landscape of research focused on evaluating OpenAlex's metadata quality compared to other traditional citation databases, differentiating empirical analyses from more general or methodological discussions.

Here's a concise summary of the timeline and development of ideas and research in the literature related to OpenAlex's metadata completeness and accuracy compared with other citation indexes:

Historical Development of Ideas:

Early Comparisons and Data Transfer (2022): Initial studies, such as the comparison of OpenAlex with Microsoft Academic Graph [11], focused on the transition and data integration into OpenAlex, setting the stage for evaluating its potential as a bibliometric tool.
Emergence of Empirical Analyses (2023): The focus shifted to more systematic evaluations of metadata completeness and accuracy. Studies began to empirically assess specific metadata elements like references and affiliations, often noting both strengths in openness and weaknesses in data elements [4, 5].
Focused Comparative Studies (2024): Recent research has enhanced the focus on direct comparisons with proprietary databases like Scopus and Web of Science across diverse aspects like ORCID identifiers and abstract availability [1, 2, 3]. These studies provide detailed insights into metadata strengths and areas needing improvement.

Clusters of Research Groups or Key Individuals:

Mayr and Collaborators (2024): Philipp Mayr and colleagues have been pivotal in advancing the empirical analysis of OpenAlex by comparing its metadata attributes with those of traditional databases, contributing significantly to understanding OpenAlex's position in scholarly data management [2, 9].
Delgado-Quirós and Ortega (2023-2024): This duo has consistently focused on metadata completeness across multiple scholarly databases, contributing to understanding general trends and challenges in OpenAlex's metadata coverage [6, 7].

In essence, the research has evolved from foundational evaluations of data integration and migration to more acute empirical comparisons, driven by key researchers and robust datasets, which collectively enhance the understanding of OpenAlex's utility and potential improvements.

Bokeh Application

References

Last 5 years

Last 2 years

> 1 citation per year

> 5 citations per year

Topic Match

Cit./Year

Year

Paper

Paper Relevance Summary

100.0%

0.0

2024

[1] Coverage and metadata availability of African publications in OpenAlex: A comparative analysis Patricia Alonso-Alvarez and Nees Jan van Eck ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 100.0% topic match

Provides an empirical comparison of metadata completeness in OpenAlex. Compares OpenAlex's metadata (references, affiliations) for African publications against Scopus and Web of Science. Identifies discrepancies in affiliation and reference metadata quality, but lacks complete focus on broader metadata elements like abstracts. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

100.0%

11.3

2024

[2] Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus Jack H. Culbert, ..., and Philipp Mayr ArXiv 2024 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 100.0% topic match

Provides empirical comparison of OpenAlex with Web of Science and Scopus. Examines reference coverage, abstracts, and ORCID capture across 16.8 million publications. Highlights discrepancies in metadata accuracy, showing average reference coverage but fewer abstracts captured by OpenAlex. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

100.0%

12.7

2024

[3] An analysis of the suitability of OpenAlex for bibliometric analyses J. Alperin, ..., and S. Haustein ArXiv 2024 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 100.0% topic match

Provides empirical comparison of metadata completeness and accuracy in OpenAlex versus Scopus. Examines issues in OpenAlex's metadata accuracy, such as affiliations, references, and citations, noting its broader coverage but existing gaps. Suggests enhancements for OpenAlex metadata quality to improve reliability for bibliometric analyses. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

70.2%

0.0

2023

[4] Web of Science Citation Gaps: An Automatic Approach to Detect Indexed but Missing Citations David Rodrigues, ..., and Fernando Batista Slate 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 70.2% topic match

Provides a comparison of missing citations between Web of Science and OpenAlex. Uses an automated approach to identify missing citations in Web of Science versus those indexed in OpenAlex. Focus is on citation gaps in Web of Science; does not address completeness/accuracy of other metadata elements (e.g., affiliations, abstracts).

63.4%

1.8

2023

[5] Global flows and rates of international migration of scholars Aliakbar Akbaritabar, ..., and E. Zagheni https://doi.org/10.4054/mpidr-wp-2023-018 2023 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 63.4% topic match

Compares metadata for scholar migration using Scopus and OpenAlex. Focuses on precision and recall for author identification, not references or citations. Highlights differences in affiliation data and entity disambiguation, but lacks broader metadata accuracy evaluation. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

57.4%

9.1

2024

[6] Completeness degree of publication metadata in eight free-access scholarly databases Lorena Delgado-Quirós and José Luis Ortega Quantitative Science Studies 2024 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 57.4% topic match

Provides a comparison of metadata completeness across scholarly databases. Analyzes metadata including abstract and bibliographic info among eight databases, highlighting OpenAlex's higher completeness rates. Does not explicitly cover references, citations, or affiliations, limiting direct relevance to the specific research question. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

46.3%

0.0

2023

[7] Comparing bibliographic descriptions in seven free-access databases Lorena Joaquina Delgado Quirós and J. Ortega 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023) 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 46.3% topic match

Provides an empirical comparison of metadata completeness across databases. Evaluates metadata elements like abstracts using a sample from Crossref, including OpenAlex. The study does not explicitly address metadata accuracy or compare references, citations, and affiliations. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

34.9%

None

[8] Quantitative comparison of publication metadata in eight free-access databases Lorena Delgado-Quirós and José Luis Ortega Journal Not Provided None - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 34.9% topic match

Provides a quantitative comparison of metadata completeness in free-access databases. It analyzes seven metadata characteristics, including bibliographic info and abstracts, across eight databases, including OpenAlex. The study indicates OpenAlex has higher metadata quality than academic search engines, focusing on completeness rather than specific elements like references or citations.

24.4%

10.0

2024

[9] Analysis of the Publication and Document Types in OpenAlex, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed and Semantic Scholar Nick Haupka, ..., and Philipp Mayr ArXiv 2024 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 24.4% topic match

Compares publication types across various bibliographic databases. Focuses on classification differences among OpenAlex, Scopus, Web of Science, and others. Lacks direct empirical evaluation of metadata completeness or accuracy for references, citations, affiliations, or abstracts. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

21.4%

12.4

2024

[10] Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Luc'ia C'espedes, ..., and Vincent Larivière ArXiv 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 21.4% topic match

Assesses OpenAlex's language metadata compared to WoS. Conducts empirical analyses on linguistic coverage but not references, citations, affiliations, or abstracts. Highlights inaccuracies in language metadata and suggests infrastructure improvements for comprehensive analysis. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

14.8%

4.6

2022

[11] Comparison of metadata with relevance for bibliometrics between Microsoft Academic Graph and OpenAlex until 2020 T. Scheidsteger and R. Haunschild ArXiv 2022 - 11 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 14.8% topic match

Provides an empirical comparison of metadata between MAG and OpenAlex. Compares document types, subject classifications, and bibliographic data like publication year and DOI. Lacks direct comparison with other citation indexes regarding references, citations, affiliations, and abstracts. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

13.9%

2.5

2024

[12] Using Scopus and OpenAlex APIs to retrieve bibliographic data for evidence synthesis. A procedure based on Bash and SQL Robin Harder MethodsX 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 13.9% topic match

Discusses data retrieval using Scopus and OpenAlex APIs. Details methodological approaches for handling data exports with Bash and SQL. Lacks empirical comparisons of metadata completeness/accuracy; not focused on specific metadata elements like references or affiliations. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

13.1%

0.0

2024

[13] Geographical and Disciplinary Coverage of Open Access Journals: OpenAlex, Scopus and WoS Abdelghani Maddi, ..., and Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 13.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

9.8%

7.2

2024

[14] Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices. Michael Gusenbauer Research synthesis methods 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite 9.8% topic match

9.4%

9.2

2024

[15] An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases Dušan Nikolić, ..., and Lidija Ivanović Scientometrics 2024 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite 9.4% topic match

8.7%

0.3

2021

[16] Open bibliographic data and the Italian National Scientific Qualification: Measuring coverage of academic fields Federica Bologna, ..., and Francesco Poggi Quantitative Science Studies 2021 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 8.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

8.1%

0.7

2023

[17] How similar are field-normalized scores from different free or commercial databases calculated for large German universities? T. Scheidsteger, ..., and L. Bornmann 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023) 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 8.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

6.8%

0.0

2024

[18] Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023 Stefanie Haustein, ..., and Nina Schönfelder ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 6.8% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

6.6%

2.3

2024

[19] biblioverlap: an R package for document matching across bibliographic datasets Gabriel Alves Vieira and J. Leta Scientometrics 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 6.6% topic match

5.6%

0.0

2023

[20] Mapping bibliographic metadata collections: the case of OpenCitations Meta and OpenAlex Elia Rizzetto and Silvio Peroni Italian Research Conference on Digital Library Management Systems 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 5.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

5.4%

0.7

2023

[21] Measuring Data Re-Use Through Dataset Citations in OpenAlex Geoff Krause and P. Mongeon 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023) 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 5.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

4.9%

0.3

2021

[22] Can we assess research using open scientific knowledge graphs? A case study within the Italian National Scientific Qualification Federica Bologna, ..., and Francesco Poggi ArXiv 2021 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 4.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

4.7%

0.0

2024

[23] Evolving interdisciplinary contributions to global societal challenges: A 50-year overview Keisuke Okamura Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 4.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

4.5%

4.8

2014

[24] Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases F. Franceschini, ..., and L. Mastrogiacomo Scientometrics 2014 - 47 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 4.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

4.1%

3.3

2021

[25] The prevalence and impact of university affiliation discrepancies between four bibliographic databases—Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, and Microsoft Academic P. Purnell Quantitative Science Studies 2021 - 11 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 4.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

4.0%

4.8

2024

[26] The open access coverage of OpenAlex, Scopus and Web of Science Marc-André Simard, ..., and Philippe Mongeon ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 4.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

3.6%

0.0

2024

[27] Acceso abierto en Argentina: una propuesta para el monitoreo de las publicaciones científicas con OpenAlex Carolina Unzurrunzaga, ..., and Juan Pablo Alperin ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: This study proposes a methodology using OpenAlex (OA) for tracking Open Access publications in the case of Argentina, a country where a self-archiving mandate has been in effect since 2013 ( Law 26.899, 2013). A sample of 167,240 papers by researchers from the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET) was created and analyzed using statistical techniques. We estimate that OA is able to capture between 85-93% of authors for all disciplines, with the exception of Social Sciences and Humanities, where it only reaches an estimated 47%. The availability of papers in Open Access was calculated to be 41% for the period 1953-2021 and 46% when considering exclusively the post-law period (2014-2021). In both periods, gold Open Access made up the most common route. When comparing equal periods post and pre-law, we observed that the upward trend of gold Open Access was pre-existing to the legislation and the availability of closed articles in repositories increased by 5% to what is estimated based on existing trends. However, while the green route has had a positive evolution, it has been the publication in gold journals that has boosted access to Argentine production more rapidly. We concluded that the OA-based methodology, piloted here for the first time, is viable for tracking Open Access in Argentina since it yields percentages similar to other national and international studies. En este estudio se propone una metodolog\'ia utilizando OpenAlex (OA) para monitorear el acceso abierto (AA) a las publicaciones cient\'ificas para el caso de Argentina, pa\'is donde rige el mandato de autoarchivo -Ley 26.899 (2013)-. Se conform\'o una muestra con 167.240 art\'iculos de investigadores del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient\'ificas y T\'ecnicas (CONICET) que se analizaron con t\'ecnicas estad\'isticas. Se estim\'o que OA puede representar entre 85-93% de los autores para todas las disciplinas, excepto Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, donde solo alcanza al 47%. Se calcul\'o que 41% de los art\'iculos publicados entre 1953-2021 incluidos en la fuente est\'an en AA, porcentaje que sube a 46% al considerar exclusivamente el periodo post ley (2014-2021). En ambos periodos es la v\'ia dorada la que representa mayor proporci\'on. Al comparar periodos iguales post y pre ley, se observ\'o que la tendencia en alza de la v\'ia dorada era preexistente a la legislaci\'on y la disponibilidad de art\'iculos cerrados en repositorios aument\'o un 5% a lo que se estima en base a tendencias existentes. Se concluye que si bien la v\'ia verde ha tenido una evoluci\'on positiva, ha sido la publicaci\'on en revistas doradas lo que ha impulsado m\'as r\'apidamente el acceso a la producci\'on argentina. Asimismo, que la metodolog\'ia basada en OA, piloteada aqu\'i por primera vez, es viable para monitorear el AA en Argentina ya que arroja porcentajes similares a otros estudios nacionales e internacionales. 3.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

3.4%

4.2

2024

[28] How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements? N. Jahn ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 3.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

3.3%

4.6

2024

[29] (Non-)retracted academic papers in OpenAlex Christian Hauschke and Serhii Nazarovets ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 3.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

3.2%

0.0

2024

[30] Dataset for bibliometric data-driven research team formation: Case of Politehnica University of Timisoara scholars for the interval 2010–2022 Christian-Daniel Curiac, ..., and A. Doboli Data in Brief 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 3.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

3.1%

0.0

2024

[31] Open bibliographic databases: in search of an alternative to Scopus and the Web of Science I. Turgel and O. A. Chernova Economics of Science 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: In the context of the recent developments in Russia, such as the termination of activities of several major scientific publishers and the blocking of access to two prominent bibliographic databases, Scopus and Web of Science, Russian scientists face a challenge in continuing their research and contributing to the scientific and educational community. This article aims to explore the potential of open bibliographic databases as a viable alternative to these two databases in addressing the main objectives of scientific and educational policies. The research methodology employed in this study involves a content analysis of relevant sources that examine science as a specialized field of human activity. Additionally, various aspects of utilizing bibliographic databases in decision-making processes related to scientific and educational policies and during actual research are considered. A comparative analysis is conducted on selected open databases to assess their suitability for different stages of scientific knowledge production. The study resulted in the characterization of several open access bibliographic databases: Russian Index of Scientific Citation (RISC), AMiner, The Lens, Dimensions, and OpenAlex. The criteria used for the analysis were: volume of content, period covered, availability of filters, data visualization tools, data upload capabilities, and additional features. Based on these criteria, it was proposed to form a subject area research program using these open bibliographic databases. It was concluded that these databases can fully replace Scopus and Web of Science in terms of solving the problem of defining the boundaries of world science and conducting scientific research. However, at the moment, there is no alternative to Scopus and Web of Science for evaluating scientific results. The study emphasizes the importance of using open bibliographic databases in scientific research and the need to develop them further. The results of the study can be useful for researchers, scientists, and policymakers who are interested in improving the quality and efficiency of scientific research in Russia 3.1% topic match

3.0%

4.0

2021

[32] Toward transparency of hybrid open access through publisher‐provided metadata: An article‐level study of Elsevier N. Jahn, ..., and Mikael Laakso Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2021 - 15 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 3.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.8%

66.7

2022

[33] OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts Jason Priem, ..., and Richard Orr ArXiv 2022 - 169 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.8% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.7%

4.8

2022

[34] Funding COVID-19 research: Insights from an exploratory analysis using open data infrastructures Alexis-Michel Mugabushaka, ..., and L. Waltman Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 13 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.6%

1.5

2021

[35] Entwicklung und Typologie des Datendiensts Unpaywall Najko Jahn, ..., and Nick Haupka Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 2021 - 5 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.6%

12.9

2019

[36] Comparison of bibliographic data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings C. Huang, ..., and Alkim Ozaygen bioRxiv 2019 - 67 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Universities are increasingly evaluated, both internally and externally on the basis of their outputs. Often these are converted to simple, and frequently contested, rankings based on quantitative analysis of those outputs. These rankings can have substantial implications for student and staff recruitment, research income and perceived prestige of a university. Both internal and external analyses usually rely on a single data source to define the set of outputs assigned to a specific university. Although some differences between such databases are documented, few studies have explored them at the institutional scale and examined the implications of these differences for the metrics and rankings that are derived from them. We address this gap by performing detailed bibliographic comparisons between three key databases: Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and, the recently relaunched Microsoft Academic (MSA). We analyse the differences between outputs with DOIs identified from each source for a sample of 155 universities and supplement this with a detailed manual analysis of the differences for fifteen universities. We find significant differences between the sources at the university level. Sources differ in the publication year of specific objects, the completeness of metadata, as well as in their coverage of disciplines, outlets, and publication type. We construct two simple rankings based on citation counts and open access status of the outputs for these universities and show dramatic changes in position based on the choice of bibliographic data sources. Those universities that experience the largest changes are frequently those from non-English speaking countries and those that are outside the top positions in international university rankings. Overall MSA has greater coverage than Scopus or WoS, but has less complete affiliation metadata. We suggest that robust evaluation measures need to consider the effect of choice of data sources and recommend an approach where data from multiple sources is integrated to provide a more robust dataset. 2.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.4%

8.8

2022

[37] The oligopoly’s shift to open access publishing Leigh-Ann Butler, ..., and S. Haustein Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI 2022 - 20 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.3%

12.6

2022

[38] The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of Science I. Basson, ..., and V. Larivière PLoS ONE 2022 - 33 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.2%

128.1

2020

[39] Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations Alberto Mart'in-Mart'in, ..., and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar Scientometrics 2020 - 582 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.1%

None

[40] in 26 Billion RDF Triples Michael Färber, ..., and Peter Haase Journal Not Provided None - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 2.1% topic match

2.0%

0.7

2015

[41] Capturing Citation Activity in Three Health Sciences Departments: A Comparison Study of Scopus and Web of Science Alexandra Sarkozy, ..., and Wendy G. Wu Medical Reference Services Quarterly 2015 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite 2.0% topic match

1.9%

3.3

2023

[42] Going Open Access: The Attitudes and Actions of Scientific Journal Editors in China Wenqi Fu, ..., and Hanqing Ma Publ. 2023 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.9%

0.0

2024

[43] Precisión de los perfiles de autor en portales institucionales de producción científica Inmaculada Bravo-García, ..., and Valeria Montoya-Roncancio Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 1.9% topic match

1.9%

5.0

2024

[44] openalexR: An R-Tool for Collecting Bibliometric Data from OpenAlex Massimo Aria, ..., and June Choe R J. 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.6%

19.4

2022

[45] Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process S. Khanna, ..., and J. Willinsky Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 38 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.6%

127.2

2018

[46] The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles Heather A. Piwowar, ..., and S. Haustein PeerJ 2018 - 859 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.6%

0.0

2022

[47] Availability and completeness of funder metadata in Crossref Hans de Jonge and Bianca Kramer Septentrio Conference Series 2022 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Research funders spend considerable efforts on collecting information about the outcomes of the research they fund. Publications are amongst important data they collect because these represent direct results of research funding. To help funders track publication output associated with their funding, Crossref initiated the Fundref project in 2013, enabling publishers to deposit funding information using persistent identifiers. Currently, 25% of articles published in 2021 have funder metadata. However, it is hard to assess that figure because it is not known how many articles are the result of funded research and therefore should include funder metadata. In this poster we present the outcomes of a study in which we try to assess the availability and completeness of funding information in Crossref. For this analysis we made use of a subset of publications of which we are certain that they are the result of funding provided by a specific funding agency (the Dutch Research Council NWO) and therefore – in theory – should contain funding information. We also compared our findings with the availability of funding information in the larger (commercial) databases. Only 67% of the 5004 articles in our dataset contain funding information in Crossref, with a subset acknowledging NWO as funder name and/or Funder IDs linked to NWO (53% and 45%, respectively). Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and Dimensions are all able to infer additional funding information from funding statements in the full text of the articles. Funding information in Lens largely corresponds to that in Crossref, with some additional funding information likely taken from PubMed. We observe interesting differences between publishers in the coverage and completeness of funding metadata in Crossref compared to proprietary databases, highlighting the need for publishers to step up their efforts to collect this data and submit to Crossref. The open unrestricted availability of structured, machine readable information about the funding of research is important for multiple reasons. Important progress has been made in recent years to promote the open availability of metadata of the scholarly record. Our research shows that the open availability of funding information, while increasing, also needs improvement. 1.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.5%

15.6

2020

[48] Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge Jonathan P. Tennant European Science Editing 2020 - 73 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.5%

2.9

2023

[49] Why are these publications missing? Uncovering the reasons behind the exclusion of documents in free‐access scholarly databases Lorena Delgado-Quirós, ..., and José Luis Ortega Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2023 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.4%

0.0

2024

[50] Growth of Science and Women: Methodological Challenges of Using Structured Big Data Marek Kwiek and Lukasz Szymula Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.4%

0.0

2021

[51] Review of: "Finding citations for PubMed: A large-scale comparison between five open access data sources" S. Peroni Qeios 2021 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.4%

13.6

2017

[52] The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university Sven E. Hug and M. Brändle Scientometrics 2017 - 104 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.4%

1.0

2022

[53] ORCID coverage in research institutions—Readiness for partially automated research reporting Kathrin Schnieders, ..., and Sonja Schulze Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 2022 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Reporting and presentation of research activities and outcome for research institutions in official, normative standards are more and more important and are the basis to comply with reporting duties. Institutional Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) serve as important databases or data sources for external and internal reporting, which should ideally be connected with interfaces to the operational systems for automated loading routines to extract relevant research information. This investigation evaluates whether (semi-) automated reporting using open, public research information collected via persistent identifiers (PIDs) for organizations (ROR), persons (ORCID), and research outputs (DOI) can reduce effort of reporting. For this purpose, internally maintained lists of persons to whom an ORCID record could be assigned (internal ORCID person lists) of two different German research institutions—Osnabrück University (UOS) and the non-university research institution TIB—Leibniz Information Center for Science and Technology Hannover—are used to investigate ORCID coverage in external open data sources like FREYA PID Graph (developed by DataCite), OpenAlex and ORCID itself. Additionally, for UOS a detailed analysis of discipline specific ORCID coverage is conducted. Substantial differences can be found for ORCID coverage between both institutions and for each institution regarding the various external data sources. A more detailed analysis of ORCID distribution by discipline for UOS reveals disparities by research area—internally and in external data sources. Recommendations for future actions can be derived from our results: Although the current level of coverage of researcher IDs which could automatically be mapped is still not sufficient to use persistent identifier-based extraction for standard (automated) reporting, it can already be a valuable input for institutional CRIS. 1.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.4%

1.1

2023

[54] Rethinking Hybrid Open Access Labels for Post-Embargo Articles Eric Schares OpenISU 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.3%

1.8

2024

[55] Comparing Funder Metadata in OpenAlex and Dimensions Eric Schares OpenISU 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.3%

8.7

2023

[56] Towards a greater engagement of universities in addressing climate change challenges W. Leal Filho, ..., and Marina Kovaleva Scientific Reports 2023 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.3%

2.6

2019

[57] Open data to evaluate academic researchers: an experiment with the Italian Scientific Habilitation A. Iorio, ..., and Francesco Poggi International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics 2019 - 15 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.2%

0.9

2020

[58] Evaluating institutional open access performance: Sensitivity analysis C. Huang, ..., and Chloe Brookes-Kenworthy bioRxiv 2020 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.2%

11.2

2024

[59] “O Author, Where Art Thou?” An Analysis of Affiliation Indexing in Canadian Journals and Bibliometric Research Potential Simon Van Bellen Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite 1.2% topic match

1.2%

78.2

2018

[60] Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases Michael Gusenbauer Scientometrics 2018 - 470 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.1%

7.7

2024

[61] Missing institutions in OpenAlex: possible reasons, implications, and solutions Lin Zhang, ..., and Ying Huang Scientometrics 2024 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite 1.1% topic match

1.1%

15.5

2021

[62] Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review Tony Ross-Hellauer, ..., and Nancy Pontika Royal Society Open Science 2021 - 52 citations - Show abstract - Cite 1.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.1%

0.0

2023

[63] OpenAlex: breve guía de consulta a través de R Ángel Borrego Infonomy 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.1%

11.7

2019

[64] Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus Nees Jan van Eck and L. Waltman ArXiv 2019 - 64 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.1%

0.0

2024

[65] Quantifying gendered citation imbalance in computer science conferences Kazuki Nakajima, ..., and George Fletcher ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.0%

19.5

2023

[66] Bibliometric Analysis: Bridging Informatics With Science. M. Lazarides, ..., and N. Papanas The international journal of lower extremity wounds 2023 - 35 citations - Show abstract - Cite 1.0% topic match

1.0%

0.0

2023

[67] Research Funding in the Middle East and North Africa: Analyses of Acknowledgments in Scientific Publications Jamal El-Ouahi ArXiv 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.9%

2.6

2022

[68] A systematic review case study of urgent and emergency care configuration found citation searching of Web of Science and Google Scholar of similar value. A. Cantrell, ..., and D. Chambers Health information and libraries journal 2022 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.9%

7.7

2024

[69] The oligopoly of academic publishers persists in exclusive database S. Bellen, ..., and Vincent Lariviere ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.9%

0.0

2024

[70] Cobertura de citações da OpenAlex, da Scopus e da Web of Science análise comparativa a partir da produção científica da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Fábio Lorensi do Canto, ..., and P. Neubert Anais do 9º Encontro Brasileiro de Bibliometria e Cientometria - EBBC 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.9% topic match

0.9%

2.2

2014

[71] Matching Medline/PubMed data with Web of Science: A routine in R language D. Rotolo and L. Leydesdorff Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2014 - 23 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.9%

3.7

2022

[72] Assessing the quality of bibliographic data sources for measuring international research collaboration B. Nguyen, ..., and V. Larivière Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 8 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.9%

5.3

2021

[73] A new comparative citation analysis: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, and Web of Science Michael Levine-Clark and Esther L. Gil Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 2021 - 19 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.9% topic match

0.9%

1.8

2024

[74] Seek and you may (not) find: A multi-institutional analysis of where research data are shared Lisa R Johnston, ..., and Cynthia Hudson Vitale PLOS ONE 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.8%

1.1

2024

[75] Scientific review of climate science: A bibliometric analysis of trends M. Goncharova and Elizaveta Sokolova E3S Web of Conferences 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.8% topic match

0.8%

32.3

2020

[76] Value and benefits of model‐based systems engineering (MBSE): Evidence from the literature Kaitlin Henderson and A. Salado Systems Engineering 2020 - 125 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.8% topic match

0.8%

2.9

2016

[77] Comparison of Microsoft Academic (Graph) with Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar Bartosz Paszcza Journal Not Provided 2016 - 23 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.8% topic match

0.8%

1.7

2008

[78] Intradisciplinary differences in database coverage and the consequences for bibliometric research T. Frandsen and J. Nicolaisen J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2008 - 27 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.8% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.8%

5.6

2024

[79] The Value of a Diamond: Understanding Global Coverage of Diamond Open Access Journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenAlex to Support an Open Future Marc-André Simard, ..., and Philippe Mongeon Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.8% topic match

0.8%

2.2

2022

[80] Which factors are associated with Open Access publishing? A Springer Nature case study Fakhri Momeni, ..., and Isabella Peters Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 5 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.8% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.8%

17.1

2019

[81] Comparison between Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed and Publishers for Mislabelled Review Papers Andy Wai Kan Yeung Current Science 2019 - 93 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.8% topic match

0.7%

1.2

2017

[82] Coverage of Author Identifiers in Web of Science and Scopus Thomas Krämer, ..., and Philipp Mayr ArXiv 2017 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.7%

286.0

2015

[83] The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis P. Mongeon and Adèle Paul-Hus Scientometrics 2015 - 2595 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.7%

8.5

2019

[84] Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approaches1 Alexander Tekles and L. Bornmann Quantitative Science Studies 2019 - 47 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.7%

1443.8

2021

[85] How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines Naveen Donthu, ..., and Weng Marc Lim Journal of Business Research 2021 - 4625 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.7% topic match

0.7%

6.5

2020

[86] Comparing institutional-level bibliometric research performance indicator values based on different affiliation disambiguation systems Paul Donner, ..., and Nees Jan van Eck Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 31 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.7%

12.5

2020

[87] Characteristics of scientific articles on COVID-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic N. Di Girolamo and R. M. Meursinge Reynders Scientometrics 2020 - 54 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.7%

8.5

2023

[88] How are exclusively data journals indexed in major scholarly databases? An examination of four databases Chenyue Jiao, ..., and Zhichao Fang Scientific Data 2023 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.6%

15.4

2010

[89] Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar Jie Li, ..., and R. Britton Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries 2010 - 219 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.6% topic match

0.6%

6.9

2024

[90] Bibliometric Analysis of Model-Based Systems Engineering: Past, Current, and Future Zihang Li, ..., and Yan Yan IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2024 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.6% topic match

0.6%

0.0

2024

[91] The rise of Indo-German collaborative research: 1990-2022 Aasif Ahmad Mir, ..., and Philipp Mayr ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Purpose This study aims to highlight the growth and development of Indo-German collaborative research over the past three decades. Moreover, this study encompasses an in-depth examination of funding acknowledgements to gain valuable insights into the financial support that underpins these collaborative endeavours. Together with this paper, the authors provide an openly accessible data set of Indo-German research papers for further and reproducible research activities (the “Indo-German Literature Dataset”). Design/methodology/approach The data were retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database from the year 1990 till the 30th of November 2022. A total of 36,999 records were retrieved against the used query. Acknowledged entities were extracted using a named entity recognition (NER) model specifically trained for this task. Interrelations between the extracted entities and scientific domains, lengths of acknowledgement texts, number of authors and affiliations, number of citations and gender of the first author, as well as collaboration patterns between Indian and German funders were examined. Findings The study reveals a consistent and increasing growth in the publication trend over the years. The study brings to light that Physics, Chemistry, Materials Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Engineering prominently dominate the Indo-German collaborative research. The USA, followed by England and France, are the most active collaborators in Indian and German research. Largely, research was funded by major German and Indian funding agencies, international corporations and German and American universities. Associations between the first author’s gender and acknowledged entity were observed. Additionally, relations between entity, entity type and scientific domain were discovered. Practical implications The study paves the way for enhanced collaboration, optimized resource utilization and societal advantages by offering a profound comprehension of the intricacies inherent in research partnerships between India and Germany. Implementation of the insights gleaned from this study holds the promise of cultivating a more resilient and influential collaborative research ecosystem between the two nations. Originality/value The study highlights a deeper understanding of the composition of the Indo-German collaborative research landscape of the past 30 years and its significance in advancing scientific knowledge and fostering international partnerships. Furthermore, the authors provide an open version of the original WoS data set. The Indo-German Literature Data set consists of 22,844 papers from OpenAlex and is available for related studies like literature studies and scientometrics. 0.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.6%

11.2

2020

[92] Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system A. C. Smith, ..., and E. Bruna https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4 2020 - 47 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.6% topic match

0.6%

8.8

2006

[93] A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar Lokman I. Meho and Kiduk Yang ArXiv 2006 - 157 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.6%

20.0

2012

[94] ORCID: a system to uniquely identify researchers Laurel L. Haak, ..., and Howard Ratner Learned Publishing 2012 - 242 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.6% topic match

0.6%

8.2

2020

[95] Brain drain and brain gain in Russia: Analyzing international migration of researchers by discipline using Scopus bibliometric data 1996–2020 A. Subbotin and Samin Aref Scientometrics 2020 - 35 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.6%

0.4

2016

[96] Recovering uncaptured citations in a scholarly network: A two‐step citation analysis to estimate publication importance Zhuoren Jiang, ..., and Yan Chen Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2016 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.6% topic match

0.6%

0.6

2023

[97] Open reproducible scientometric research with Alexandria3k D. Spinellis PLOS ONE 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

5.7

2018

[98] Missing author address information in Web of Science-An explorative study Weishu Liu, ..., and Li Tang J. Informetrics 2018 - 36 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

0.0

2024

[99] Fully Automated Scholarly Search for Biomedical Systematic Literature Reviews Leandra Budau and F. Ensan IEEE Access 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

0.5%

92.8

2020

[100] Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic M. Visser, ..., and L. Waltman Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 416 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

0.0

2021

[101] Crossref reports for publishers and scientific publications A. Ermakov Proceedings of 23rd Scientific Conference “Scientific Services & Internet – 2021” 2021 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

0.5%

12.5

2019

[102] Low income countries have the highest percentages of open access publication: A systematic computational analysis of the biomedical literature Jonathan Iyandemye and Marshall P Thomas PLoS ONE 2019 - 66 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Open access publication rates have been steadily increasing over time. In spite of this growth, academics in low income settings struggle to gain access to the full canon of research literature. While the vast majority of open access repositories and funding organizations with open access policies are based in high income countries, the geographic patterns of open access publication itself are not well characterized. In this study, we developed a computational approach to better understand the topical and geographical landscape of open access publications in the biomedical research literature. Surprisingly, we found a strong negative correlation between country per capita income and the percentage of open access publication. Open access publication rates were particularly high in sub-Saharan Africa, but vastly lower in the Middle East and North Africa, South Asia, and East Asia and the Pacific. These effects persisted when considering papers only bearing authors from within each region and income group. However, papers resulting from international collaborations did have a higher percentage of OA than single-country papers, and inter-regional collaboration increased OA publication for all world regions. There was no clear relationship between the number of open access policies in a region and the percentage of open access publications in that region. To understand the distribution of open access across topics of biomedical research, we examined keywords that were most enriched and depleted in open access papers. Keywords related to genomics, computational biology, animal models, and infectious disease were enriched in open access publications, while keywords related to the environment, nursing, and surgery were depleted in open access publications. This work identifies geographic regions and fields of research that could be priority areas for open access advocacy. The finding that open access publication rates are highest in sub-Saharan Africa and low income countries suggests that factors other than open access policy strongly influence authors’ decisions to make their work openly accessible. The high proportion of OA resulting from international collaborations indicates yet another benefit of collaborative research. Certain applied fields of medical research, notably nursing, surgery, and environmental fields, appear to have a greater proportion of fee-for-access publications, which presumably creates barriers that prevent researchers and practitioners in low income settings from accessing the literature in those fields. 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

7.9

2022

[103] National differences in dissemination and use of open access literature Marc-André Simard, ..., and V. Larivière PLoS ONE 2022 - 18 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

1.2

2018

[104] Automated author affiliation processing using Scopus data Marcus Walther and Bastian Melsheimer International Conference on Current Research Information Systems 2018 - 8 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.5% topic match

0.5%

16.8

2021

[105] Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Dimensions and Scopus: An Approach at the Country and Institutional Levels V. Guerrero-Bote, ..., and F. M. Anegón Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 2021 - 64 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

39.0

2009

[106] Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus Éric Archambault, ..., and V. Larivière ArXiv 2009 - 609 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

1.3

2005

[107] Welcome to the linguistic warp zone: Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities V. Larivière Journal Not Provided 2005 - 25 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: The goal of this paper is to examine the impact of linguistic coverage of databases used by bibliometricians on the capacity to effectively benchmark the work of social scientists and humanities researchers in various countries. The paper firstly examines the strong link between bibliometrics and the ISI's database and, subsequently, reviews the differences in the production and diffusion of knowledge in the SSH and NSE. This leads to an examination of the old debate on the coverage of ISI's databases, more specifically in the case of SSH. The methods section explain how we have compared the coverage of ISI's databases in the NSE and SSH to the Ulrich extensive database of journals. Our results show that there is a 20 to 25% overrepresentation of English-language journals in ISI's databases compared to the list of journals presented in Ulrich. This paper concludes that because of this bias, ISI's databases cannot be used to benchmark the output of countries in the SSH. Introduction Scientometric methods are increasingly used for science policy purposes, more particularly in Europe. The use of scientometrics for policy purposes has so far been mostly limited to the natural sciences and engineering (NSE), but this is changing and the extension of this evaluation process to the social sciences and humanities (SSH) may be a cause for concern. A number of scholars have highlighted fundamental differences between the scientific communication practices of scholars in the NSE and those in the SSH (Glänzel and Schoepflin, 1999; Hicks, 1999 and 2004; van Raan, 2003). For instance, SSH comprise a greater proportion of scientific publications which are not journal articles, and especially the proportion of books; referencing practices that translate in fewer citations towards relatively older literature; and the relatively more local orientation of research in the SSH. Indeed, while policy makers can count on scientometrics to produce relatively reliable and valuable results on the research performed in the NSE, their application to the SSH has been shown to be problematic for many reasons. A number of bibliographic characteristics proper to the SSH hampers scientometric analyses: research results are disseminated through a much broader range of media than in the NSE; referencing practices that translate in fewer citations towards relatively older literature; and the relatively more local orientation of research in the 1 This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. SSH. The problem posed by this last specificity is particularly important since efforts to solve it involve the changing of one of the central tools of scientometrics: the Thomson ISI Citation Indexes. Most bibliometric studies are based on one or more of the Thomson ISI databases: the Science Citation Index (SCI), the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), and the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI). The literature has argued the SSCI and the AHCI do not cover adequately journals and articles in languages other than English. In fact, there has been a healthy debate going on for years on this issue. Considering the potential expansion of scientometric evaluation for policy purposes to the SSH, this debate is highly relevant. The goal of this paper is to shed light on this debate and to examine the impact of linguistic coverage of the database on the capacity to effectively benchmark the work of social scientists and humanities researchers in various countries. The paper firstly examines the strong link between bibliometrics and the ISI's database and subsequently the differences between SSH and NSE. This reviews leads to examine the old debate on the coverage of ISI's databases, more specifically in the case of SSH. The methods section explain how we have compared the coverage of ISI's databases in the NSE and SSH to the Ulrich extensive database of journals. Our results show that there is a 20 to 25% overrepresentation of English-language journals in ISI's databases compared to the list of journals presented in Ulrich. This paper concludes that because of this bias, ISI's databases cannot be used to benchmark the output of countries in the SSH. The marriage of bibliometrics and ISI's databases Bibliometrics and scientometrics are a set of methods for measuring the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Derek de Solla Price and Vasilij Vasilevich Nalimov were the originators of the discipline, which they developed for the purpose of providing research tools to historians and sociologists of science. However, it was only with the advent of the tools developed by the Institute for Scientific Information (now Thomson ISI) and the research conducted by its founder, Eugene Garfield, that the use of bibliometrics became widespread. With their systematic archiving of articles from a selection of some of the most prestigious and most often cited scholarly journals, the Thomson ISI databases considerably reduce the effort required to carry out bibliometric analysis. This partly explains why there has been a marriage of interest between ISI and the bibliometric community and why the most commonly used databases in bibliometric analyses are by far the ones produced by Thomson ISI. It must also be stated that ISI production process, although not always as transparent as the bibliometrician would like it to be, is fairly well documented. Established scholars select the journals to be covered in cooperation with users, publishers and members of editorial boards. Selection criteria include publication frequency, compliance with international presentation conventions, and a peer review committee. ISI's databases are particularly useful for a number of reasons (see Katz and Hicks, 1998, among others): • Their primary advantage is coverage. They cover all research fields, giving ready access to aggregated data. Unlike a number of other databases, which may cover some journals only in part (depending on the relevance of an article to singlediscipline databases, for example), these databases systematically index all articles and other items in the selected journals. Nearly 10,000 existing learned journals are covered (Katz and Hicks, 1998). • The criterion for including a journal in SCI and SSCI is the number of citations it receives. Because citations are perceived to be an indicator of interest and recognition on the part of scholars, the citation count is considered as evidence of the usefulness, quality and/or impact of a journal. According to Eugene Garfield, 90– 95% of the most frequently cited articles in the natural sciences are published in a core group of about 2000 journals (CNER, 2002, citing Garfield, 1996). However, it is noteworthy that AHCI inclusion criteria are more subjective. According to Thomson ISI: Publishing standards, including timeliness, are also important in the evaluation of Arts and Humanities journals. Citations in the Arts and Humanities, however, do not necessarily follow this same predictable pattern as citations to Social Sciences and Natural Sciences articles. Citations to an article on the 19th Century Romantic novel, for example, may accrue slowly at first, and then slacken, fluctuating over time in cycles consistent with scholars' varying interest in the topic. In addition, Arts and Humanities journal articles reference non-journal sources heavily (e.g., books, musical compositions, works of art and literature). Consequently, citation data, while sometimes useful, are frequently much less so in journal evaluations in the Arts and Humanities. Arts & Humanities journals are selected by the primary editor with the support of the subject experts from the ISI Arts & Humanities indexing staff. The goal is the collection of superb Arts and Humanities content that reflects the complex nature of cultural phenomena across a broad range of fields. http://www.isinet.com/essays/selectionofmaterialforcoverage/199701.html/ • The Thomson ISI databases contain the institutional addresses for all authors of a given article. Other databases usually contain only the address of the first-named author. Without a complete address list, the analysis of collaboration research analysis is impossible. • Only the Thomson ISI databases contain citation information, which makes it possible to measure research impact. In the opinion of Katz and Hicks, this attribute alone justifies using these databases as science policy and research management tools. The Thomson ISI databases, like all databases used for scientometric evaluation, also have limits. These will affect the validity of bibliometric evaluation in both the NSE and the SSH. The main problems with research publication databases comprise (CNER, 2002): • limited coverage; • exclusion of certain types of documents; • classification of journals by discipline; • changes in journal titles; • different individual authors with identical names (homographs); • unequal distribution of work among authors which might not be reflected; • negative and erroneous citations, self-citation and personal strategies. Another disadvantage is that they are relatively costly to use (Katz and Hicks, 1998). Since bibliometrics is generally based on the use of bibliographic databases, all the above factors reduce the reliability of bibliometric research evaluation. These problems are common to most the databases and reflect the limitations of compiling and indexing academic journals and articles. But scientometric analyses may also be affected negatively by some practices and situations specific to the field concerned. This is exactly the case with the SSH, as can be seen in the following section. SSH are not NSE According to Line (1999), most social sciences can be described as “relatively young, and scarcely organized as coherent disciplines.” He suggests that the SSH are fragmented because they do not have international standards for rigorously defining concepts. Terms 0.5% topic match

0.5%

0.0

1999

[108] Indagine comparativa tra i database bibliografici MEDLINE, EMBASE e PASCAL Biomed A. D. Robbio Journal Not Provided 1999 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.5% topic match

0.5%

9.5

2020

[109] Who’s writing open access (OA) articles? Characteristics of OA authors at Ph.D.-granting institutions in the United States A. Olejniczak and Molly J. Wilson Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 44 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

4.8

2020

[110] Scholarly migration within Mexico: analyzing internal migration among researchers using Scopus longitudinal bibliometric data A. D. Gonz'alez, ..., and E. Zagheni EPJ Data Science 2020 - 22 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

0.0

2024

[111] Time to Publication in Medical Education Journals: An Analysis of Publication Timelines During COVID-19 (2019–2022) Lauren A. Maggio, ..., and TingLan Ma Perspectives on Medical Education 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.4% topic match

0.4%

4.7

2015

[112] Evaluation of the citation matching algorithms of CWTS and iFQ in comparison to the Web of science Marlies Olensky, ..., and Nees Jan van Eck Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2015 - 44 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

3.7

2006

[113] Language Planning for International Scientific Communication: An Overview of Questions and Potential Solutions U. Ammon Current Issues in Language Planning 2006 - 70 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.4% topic match

0.4%

10.3

2022

[114] The Microsoft Academic Knowledge Graph enhanced: Author name disambiguation, publication classification, and embeddings Michael Färber and Lin Ao Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 28 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

59.5

2019

[115] Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis I. Marshall and Byron C. Wallace Systematic Reviews 2019 - 318 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

57.9

2007

[116] Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar Lokman I. Meho and Kiduk Yang J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2007 - 1035 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: The Institute for Scientific Information’s (ISI) citation databases have been used for decades as a starting point and often as the only tools for locating citations and/or conducting citation analyses. ISI databases (or Web of Science [WoS]), however, may no longer be sufficient because new databases and tools that allow citation searching are now available. Using citations to the work of 25 library and information science faculty members as a case study, this paper examines the effects of using Scopus and Google Scholar (GS) on the citation counts and rankings of scholars as measured by WoS. Overall, more than 10,000 citing and purportedly citing documents were examined. Results show that Scopus significantly alters the relative ranking of those scholars that appear in the middle of the rankings and that GS stands out in its coverage of conference proceedings as well as international, non-English language journals. The use of Scopus and GS, in addition to WoS, helps reveal a more accurate and comprehensive picture of the scholarly impact of authors. WoS data took about 100 hours of collecting and processing time, Scopus consumed 200 hours, and GS a grueling 3,000 hours. INTRODUCTION Academic institutions, federal agencies, publishers, editors, authors, and librarians increasingly rely on citation analysis, along with publications assessment and expert opinions, for making hiring, promotion, tenure, funding, and/or reviewer and journal evaluation and selection decisions. In general, citation counts or rankings are considered partial indicators of research impact/quality, often used to support and/or question other indicators such as peer judgment (Borgman & Furner, 2002; Cronin, 1984; Holden, Rosenberg, & Barker, 2005; Moed, 2005; van Raan, 1996, 2005; Wallin, 2005). To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Many scholars have argued for and against the use of citations for assessing research impact or quality. Proponents have reported the validity and reliability of citation counts in research assessments as well as the positive correlation between these counts and peer reviews/assessments of publication venues (Aksnes & Taxt, 2004; Glänzel, 1996; Kostoff, 1996; Martin, 1996; Narin, 1976; So, 1998; van Raan, 2000). Critics, on the other hand, claim that citation counting has serious problems or limitations that affect its validity (MacRoberts & MacRoberts, 1996; Seglen, 1998). Important limitations reported in the literature focus on, among other things, the problems associated with the data sources used, especially the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, currently Thomson Scientific) citation databases: Arts & Humanities Citation Index, Science Citation Index, and Social Sciences Citation Index—the standard and most widely used tools for generating citation data for research and other assessment purposes. These tools are now currently part of what is known as Web of Science (WoS), the portal used to search the three ISI citation databases. In this paper, we use ISI citation databases and WoS interchangeably. Critics of ISI citation databases note that they: (1) cover mainly North American, Western European, and English-language titles; (2) are limited to citations from 8,700 journals; (3) do not count citations from books and most conference proceedings; (4) provide different coverage between research fields; and (5) have citing errors, such as homonyms, synonyms, and inconsistency in the use of initials and in the spelling of non-English names (many of these errors, however, come from the primary documents themselves rather than being the result of faulty ISI indexing). Studies that have addressed problems of, and/or suggested alternative or complementary sources to, ISI citation databases are very few and can be divided into two main groups: Studies that examined the effect of certain limitations in ISI database, most often comparing its coverage with that of other citation sources; and Studies that suggested or explored different or additional sources and methods for identifying citations. Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory lists approximately 22,500 active academic/scholarly, refereed journals. Of these, approximately 7,500 are published in the United States, 4,150 in the United Kingdom, 1,600 in the Netherlands, 1,370 in Germany, 660 in Australia, 540 in Japan, and 500 in Canada, 450 in China, 440 in India, and 420 in France. 0.4% topic match

0.4%

38.7

2014

[117] When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology L. Thygesen and A. Ersbøll European Journal of Epidemiology 2014 - 420 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.4% topic match

0.4%

5.7

2019

[118] Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview of different methodological options Biljana Macura, ..., and R. Rodela Environmental Evidence 2019 - 31 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

1.9

2012

[119] Going for Gold? The costs and benefits of Gold Open Access for UK research institutions: further economic modelling A. Swan and J. Houghton Journal Not Provided 2012 - 24 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.4% topic match

0.4%

0.8

2023

[120] How are exclusively data journals indexed in major scholarly databases? An examination of the Web of Science, Scopus, Dimensions, and OpenAlex Chenyue Jiao, ..., and Zhichao Fang ArXiv 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

13.8

2023

[121] New trends in bibliometric APIs: A comparative analysis A. Velez-Estevez, ..., and M. Cobo Inf. Process. Manag. 2023 - 19 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.4% topic match

0.4%

11.8

2016

[122] Citation analysis with microsoft academic Sven E. Hug, ..., and M. Brändle Scientometrics 2016 - 96 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

0.3

2015

[123] On the Correction of "Old" Omitted Citations by Bibliometric Databases F. Franceschini, ..., and L. Mastrogiacomo International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics 2015 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.4% topic match

0.3%

11.7

2022

[124] Open-access publishing fees deter researchers in the global south. Diana Kwon Nature 2022 - 32 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.3% topic match

0.3%

1.7

2022

[125] Open Access perpetuates differences between higher‐ and lower‐income countries P. Santidrián Tomillo, ..., and A. Payo‐Payo Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2022 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

0.0

2022

[126] Improving the Quality of Metadata Scientific Publications with Crossref Reports Алексей Викторович Ермаков Russian Digital Libraries Journal 2022 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

0.3%

0.5

2022

[127] Scholarly big data quality assessment: a case study of document linking and conflation with S2ORC Jian Wu, ..., and C. Lee Giles Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2022 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

188.9

2020

[128] The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis V. Singh, ..., and Philipp Mayr Scientometrics 2020 - 763 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

0.4

2008

[129] WOS vs. Scopus: On the reliability of scientometrics V. Larivière Journal Not Provided 2008 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.3% topic match

0.3%

7.9

2023

[130] Increased Role of Open Bibliographic Data in the Context of Restricted Access to Proprietary Information Systems V. Gureev and N. Mazov Science Management: Theory and Practice 2023 - 11 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.3% topic match

0.3%

9.2

2008

[131] Data sources for performing citation analysis: an overview Christoph Neuhaus and Hans-Dieter Daniel J. Documentation 2008 - 153 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.3% topic match

0.3%

2.3

2021

[132] Return migration of German-affiliated researchers: analyzing departure and return by gender, cohort, and discipline using Scopus bibliometric data 1996–2020 Xinyi Zhao, ..., and G. Stecklov Scientometrics 2021 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

0.5

2017

[133] A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Open Access in Scopus J. Chung and Ming-yueh Tsay Journal Not Provided 2017 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: Using bibliometric techniques, this study investigates the characteristics of the literature on open access related research. The bibliometric data collected from Scopus, such as document type, country of publication, language of publication, subject area and the publication year of the open access documents, is used. In addition, the most cited articles, the top journals, the most productive authors and the institutions with the highest number of papers are also identified. The results of the study show that: 1.thirteen document types and 7,721 documents from 1972 to 2012, peer-reviewed journal articles (4,793; 62%) are the most frequently used type and the most popular publication media; 2.the US (2,204; 27%) and the UK (1,172; 14%) with 3,376 (41%) of the articles, are the countries with the greatest contribution, from a total of 128 countries’ authors; 3.English (7,316; 94%) dominates the other languages as the most frequently used language; 4.the top 3 subject areas are medicine ( 2,753; 22％), social science (1,787; 14%), biochemistry and genetics, molecular biology (1,253; 10％); 5.the last 10 years (20032012) account for 6513 (84.3%), as the highest output; 6.the most cited papers, published on Remote Sensing of Environment, are cited 2043 times, written by 13 coauthors in 1998 and supported by NASA in the US; 7.Plos One, with the most total publications on open access, published 554 papers; 8.the top 3 most productive authors are Bjork, B.C., from Finland, with 29 articles on open access, McGrath, M., from the United Kingdom, with 27articles on open access and Harnad, S., from Canada, with 24articles; and 9.the top institution is the University of Toronto (Canada). The future development of open access research will be of increasing importance, with more subject areas, authors, institutions and journals. The OA movement, an innovation in scholarly communication, is growing quickly and will widely influence in different subject areas and changes in related research worldwide. 0.3% topic match

0.3%

22.3

2018

[134] Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison Alberto Martín-Martín, ..., and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar Scientometrics 2018 - 146 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

6.8

2016

[135] An Analysis of the Microsoft Academic Graph Drahomira Herrmannova and Petr Knoth D Lib Mag. 2016 - 56 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.3% topic match

0.3%

0.0

2024

[136] Public funding accountability: a linked open data-based methodology for analysing the scientific productivity and influence of funded projects Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez, ..., and M. C. Grácio Scientometrics 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

38.7

2019

[137] Web of Science and Scopus language coverage Miguel-Angel Vera-Baceta, ..., and K. Kousha Scientometrics 2019 - 197 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.3% topic match

0.3%

0.5

2023

[138] Report of the G7 Open Science - Research on Research Sub-Working Group Mathieu Régnier and Marin Dacos https://doi.org/10.52949/32 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

2.4

2021

[139] Transformative agreements: Six myths, busted: Lessons learned Ashley Farley, ..., and Megan Wacha College & Research Libraries News 2021 - 8 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

2.3

2016

[140] Data Resource Profile: The Human Fertility Database. Aiva Jasilioniene, ..., and V. Shkolnikov International journal of epidemiology 2016 - 19 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

0.3%

0.1

2006

[141] Citation tracking of scientific publications through two different searching tools : Google scholar and Web of science M. D. Seta and R. Cammarano Journal Not Provided 2006 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: Citation analysis has been used since the mid-20th century as a tool to measure impact and visibility of scientific articles, to monitor a subject trend, and to evaluate the scientific impact of a given researcher or institution. Although it has been recognized as an often inappropriately applied practice, the impact factors of journals in which authors publish are still employed in many countries to evaluate the performance of an author or of a research group in order to award grants or government funding. The purpose of this presentation is to assess similarities and differences in citation tracking of scientific publications of two searching tools: Google Scholar (GS) and Web of Science (WoS). Google Scholar http://scholar.google.com is a free-of-charge search engine aimed at finding scholarly information on the Web, available in its beta version since November 2004. Its search includes bibliographic references and the full-text of peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, abstracts, technical reports. The special feature of Google Scholar is its "cited by" option which provides searchers with links to other articles that have cited the paper being viewed; its search engine automatically extracts and analyzes citations and presents them as separate results, giving links to the full-text of the articles as present on the Web. Thomson Web of Science http://scientific.thomson.com/webofknowledge/wosgenben.html is a subscription-based multidisciplinary database covering scientific literature from about 6,125 journals dating from as far back as 1945. It’s a valuable and well-known tool for exhaustive research. The feature "cited reference" enables users to find articles that cite a previously published work. Two samples of articles published on scientific journals in the year 2002 were examined to evaluate the number of citations received by each article over the 2002- 2006 period, both in GS and in WoS. An analysis of unique and overlapping citations was performed. Results show that retrieval of citations found in Web of Science was higher in 2005 than in Google Scholar, while in 2006 the amount of citations retrieved has been almost equal. Since resulting citations do not match exactly, due to the difference in type of documentation considered by search algorithms, the two instruments can be seen as complementary, although a high percentage of overlapping material results from this research. 0.3% topic match

0.2%

1.0

2006

[142] Institutional addresses in the Web of Science: the effects on scientific evaluation Carlos García-Zorita, ..., and E. Sanz-Casado Journal of Information Science 2006 - 18 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

5.8

2024

[143] Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs David Nicholas, ..., and Eti Herman Learned Publishing 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

8.2

2020

[144] Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda C. Blümel and Alexander Schniedermann Scientometrics 2020 - 38 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

1.8

2022

[145] The availability and completeness of open funder metadata: Case study for publications funded by the Dutch Research Council Bianca Kramer and H. D. Jonge Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

15.8

2020

[146] COVID-19 will stimulate a new coronavirus research breakthrough: a 20-year bibliometric analysis Zhengbo Tao, ..., and L. Tao Annals of Translational Medicine 2020 - 73 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

0.2%

4.9

2018

[147] How Unpaywall is transforming open science Holly Else Nature 2018 - 31 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

0.0

2021

[148] Proof of Reference(PoR): A unified informetrics based consensus mechanism P. Khurana, ..., and K. Sharma ArXiv 2021 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

7.3

2020

[149] The pricing of open access journals: Diverse niches and sources of value in academic publishing Kyle Siler and K. Frenken Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 35 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2024

[150] Egestabase – An online evidence platform to discover and explore options to recover plant nutrients from human excreta and domestic wastewater for reuse in agriculture Robin Harder, ..., and Jennifer R. McConville MethodsX 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

2.4

2020

[151] A quantitative view of the structure of institutional scientific collaborations using the example of Berlin Aliakbar Akbaritabar Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 10 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

7.7

2021

[152] Faculty Attitudes Towards Article Processing Charges for Open Access Articles Gali Halevi and S. Walsh Publishing Research Quarterly 2021 - 26 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.2

2015

[153] Chemical bibliographic databases: the influence of term indexing policies on topic searches G. Niel, ..., and D. Virieux New Journal of Chemistry 2015 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

0.2%

0.0

2024

[154] Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles and application of nanoadditives in diesel fuel: bibliometric analysis I. Morenko, ..., and Galina Ostaeva E3S Web of Conferences 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2024

[155] Strategic assessment model of smart stadiums based on genetic algorithms and literature visualization analysis: A case study from Chengdu, China Xi Zhu and Xiaobo Peng Heliyon 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

1.3

2022

[156] Homecoming after Brexit: evidence on academic migration from bibliometric data A. E. Şanlıtürk, ..., and F. Billari https://doi.org/10.4054/mpidr-wp-2022-019 2022 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

11.9

2023

[157] The oligopoly of open access publishing Fei Shu and Vincent Larivière Scientometrics 2023 - 11 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

19.9

2016

[158] Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science F. Franceschini, ..., and L. Mastrogiacomo J. Informetrics 2016 - 160 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

2.3

2020

[159] Mitigating Biases in CORD-19 for Analyzing COVID-19 Literature Anshul Kanakia, ..., and Chieh-Han Wu Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 2020 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: On the behest of the Office of Science and Technology Policy in the White House, six institutions, including ours, have created an open research dataset called COVID-19 Research Dataset (CORD-19) to facilitate the development of question-answering systems that can assist researchers in finding relevant research on COVID-19. As of May 27, 2020, CORD-19 includes more than 100,000 open access publications from major publishers and PubMed as well as preprint articles deposited into medRxiv, bioRxiv, and arXiv. Recent years, however, have also seen question-answering and other machine learning systems exhibit harmful behaviors to humans due to biases in the training data. It is imperative and only ethical for modern scientists to be vigilant in inspecting and be prepared to mitigate the potential biases when working with any datasets. This article describes a framework to examine biases in scientific document collections like CORD-19 by comparing their properties with those derived from the citation behaviors of the entire scientific community. In total, three expanded sets are created for the analyses: 1) the enclosure set CORD-19E composed of CORD-19 articles and their references and citations, mirroring the methodology used in the renowned “A Century of Physics” analysis; 2) the full closure graph CORD-19C that recursively includes references starting with CORD-19; and 3) the inflection closure CORD-19I, that is, a much smaller subset of CORD-19C but already appropriate for statistical analysis based on the theory of the scale-free nature of the citation network. Taken together, all these expanded datasets show much smoother trends when used to analyze global COVID-19 research. The results suggest that while CORD-19 exhibits a strong tilt toward recent and topically focused articles, the knowledge being explored to attack the pandemic encompasses a much longer time span and is very interdisciplinary. A question-answering system with such expanded scope of knowledge may perform better in understanding the literature and answering related questions. However, while CORD-19 appears to have topical coverage biases compared to the expanded sets, the collaboration patterns, especially in terms of team sizes and geographical distributions, are captured very well already in CORD-19 as the raw statistics and trends agree with those from larger datasets. 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

1.7

2024

[160] The increasing fragmentation of global science limits the diffusion of ideas Alexander J. Gates, ..., and Jianjian Gao ArXiv 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

3.3

2016

[161] The contribution of ethnic groups to Malaysian scientific output, 1982–2014, and the effects of the new economic policy G. Lewison, ..., and R. Webber Scientometrics 2016 - 27 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

7.2

2021

[162] Is preprint the future of science? A thirty year journey of online preprint services Boya Xie, ..., and Kuansan Wang ArXiv 2021 - 27 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

20.6

2011

[163] Budapest Open Access Initiativeの思想的背景とその受容 Yukinori Okabe, ..., and Hiroshi Itsumura Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi 2011 - 270 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

8.2

2023

[164] A gender perspective on the global migration of scholars Xinyi Zhao, ..., and E. Zagheni Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2023 - 14 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

16.0

2023

[165] Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review Á. Borrego Learned Publishing 2023 - 22 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

10.8

2002

[166] Cross‐national comparison of internal migration: issues and measures Martin Bell, ..., and Graeme Hugo Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 2002 - 240 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

0.2%

5.8

2019

[167] The ‘who’ and the ‘what’ in international migration research: data-driven analysis of Scopus-indexed scientific literature Saeed-Ul Hassan, ..., and Hajra Waheed Behaviour & Information Technology 2019 - 33 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

2.2

2013

[168] A novel approach for estimating the omitted-citation rate of bibliometric databases with an application to the field of bibliometrics F. Franceschini, ..., and L. Mastrogiacomo J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2013 - 24 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

0.2%

22.1

2019

[169] OpenCitations, an infrastructure organization for open scholarship S. Peroni and D. Shotton Quantitative Science Studies 2019 - 119 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2021

[170] Analysis of Crossref Reports in Order to Improve the Quality of Metadata of Scientific Publications A. Ermakov Conference on Scientific Services & Internet 2021 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2019

[171] Shifting data sources in the rankings of universities Karl Huang, ..., and Chloe Brookes-Kenworthy Journal Not Provided 2019 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

1.8

2023

[172] Creating a Scholarly API Cookbook: Supporting Library Users with Programmatic Access to Information Vincent F. Scalfani, ..., and Adam M. Nguyen Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 2023 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

36.7

2021

[173] UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science A. Nóvoa https://doi.org/10.54677/mnmh8546 2021 - 142 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.7

2008

[174] Use of the Checklist Method for Content Evaluation of Full-text Databases : An Investigation of Two Databases Based on Citations from Two Journals T. Nisonger Library Resources & Technical Services 2008 - 11 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

0.2%

6.6

2022

[175] The Semantic Scholar Academic Graph (S2AG) Alex D Wade Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022 2022 - 17 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

0.2%

None

[176] study of the scientific production on music education in Spain (1978–2022) Estudio bibliométrico de la producción científica de educación musical en España (1978-2022) PhD. Gregorio VICENTE-NICOLÁS, ..., and Molina de Segura Journal Not Provided None - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

4.9

2023

[177] Global patterns of migration of scholars with economic development Ebru Sanliturk, ..., and Aliakbar Akbaritabar Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2023 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

7.2

2013

[178] Towards a Multilingual, Comprehensive and Open Scientific Journal Ontology Éric Archambault, ..., and Julie Caruso Journal Not Provided 2013 - 86 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

1.1

2024

[179] The paper mill crisis is a five-alarm fire for science: what can librarians do about it? Curtis Brundy and Joel B. Thornton Insights the UKSG journal 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

2.1

2024

[180] Acceso abierto en Argentina. Una propuesta para el monitoreo de las publicaciones científicas con OpenAlex Carolina Unzurrunzaga, ..., and Juan Pablo Alperin Información, cultura y sociedad 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

41.3

2014

[181] Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap Julian H. Elliott, ..., and R. Gruen PLoS Medicine 2014 - 445 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2024

[182] Measuring Data Re-Use In OpenAlex by Researchers, Institutions, and Countries Geoff Krause, ..., and Michael Smit Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

5.1

2019

[183] Demography in the Digital Era: New Data Sources for Population Research Diego Alburez-Gutierrez, ..., and D. Negraia https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/24jp7 2019 - 30 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

761.5

2009

[184] Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping Nees Jan van Eck and L. Waltman Scientometrics 2009 - 11325 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

1.3

2021

[185] Identifying and correcting invalid citations due to DOI errors in Crossref data A. Cioffi, ..., and Nooshin Shahidzadeh Asadi Scientometrics 2021 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2015

[186] Use of CrossRef and OAI-PMH to Enrich Bibliographical Databases Mehmet Ali Abdulhayoglu and B. Thijs International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics 2015 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

2.6

2022

[187] Left in the Cold: The Failure of APC Waiver Programs to Provide Author Equity S. Rouhi, ..., and Curtis Brundy Science Editor 2022 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Scholarly Publishing (C4DISC), is to “...build equity, inclusion, diversity, and accessibility in scholarly communications.”1 As part of its values, C4DISC member and partner organizations seek to welcome diverse perspectives, learn from different communities, make space for marginalized communities, and eliminate barriers. Among the C4DISC members or partners are the Council of Science Editors, Society for Scholarly Publishing, Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association, Elsevier, American Chemical Society, Sage, Taylor and Francis, and Wiley, as well as two of the authors’ own organizations, PLOS and the Iowa State University Library. This article is about author equity and waivers, not about workplace diversity and equity, which is the focus C4DISC’s efforts to date. But we believe concern over waiver programs and author equity aligns squarely with the stated values of C4DISC and with many of the stated diversity, equity, and inclusion values of its member organizations. We also believe it is insuffi cient for scholarly communication organizations to only pursue equity and diversity in certain aspects of their operations while ignoring it in others. Therefore, this is an article about inequity in scholarly communication. It is about the continued restriction of space for marginalized communities in scholarly communication. And it is about the growth of barriers and the exclusion of diverse perspectives in scholarly communication. The authors will offer 3 perspectives on the issue of waiver programs and author equity: 1) Romy Beard, until recently, was the Licensing Programme Manager at Electronic Information for Libraries (EIFL), where she worked with libraries and consortia from developing and transitioning economy countries in Europe, Asia, and Africa; 2) Sara Rouhi is the Director of Strategic Partnerships at PLOS, where she focuses on building non-APC, inclusive business models to make publishing more equitable; and 3) Curtis Brundy oversees collections and scholarly communications at the Iowa State University Library, which has committed to transitioning its subscription spending to support equitable OA. We will include recommendations for improving waiver programs as well as for adopting open models that have equity built in, making waivers unnecessary. Sara Rouhi, Romy Beard, and Curtis Brundy 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.2

2013

[188] Recovering missing citations in a scholarly network: a 2-step citation analysis to estimate publication importance Zhuoren Jiang and Xiaozhong Liu ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2013 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2024

[189] Recent Publication Trends of Systems Engineers: Journals, Topics, and the Impact of Open Access J. Caddell and Roshi Rose Nilchiani 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE) 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

12.7

2018

[190] The many faces of mobility: Using bibliometric data to measure the movement of scientists N. Robinson-García, ..., and R. Costas J. Informetrics 2018 - 85 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

3.4

2019

[191] Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication Nicky Agate The Idealis 2019 - 20 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

1.3

2022

[192] Assessment of the Dissemination of COVID-19–Related Articles Across Social Media: Altmetrics Study Haley N Tornberg, ..., and David J. Diemertg JMIR Formative Research 2022 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

None

[193] Distributed under Creative Commons Cc-by 4.0 a Study of Institutional Spending on Open Access Publication Fees in Germany N. Jahn, ..., and Marco Tullney Journal Not Provided None - 62 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: Publication fees as a revenue source for open access publishing hold a prominent place on the agendas of researchers, policy makers, and academic publishers. This study contributes to the evolving empirical basis for funding these charges and examines how much German universities and research organisations spent on open access publication fees. Using self-reported cost data from the Open APC initiative, the analysis focused on the amount that was being spent on publication fees, and compared these expenditure with data from related Austrian (FWF) and UK (Wellcome Trust, Jisc) initiatives, in terms of both size and the proportion of articles being published in fully and hybrid open access journals. We also investigated how thoroughly self-reported articles were indexed in Crossref, a DOI minting agency for scholarly literature, and analysed how the institutional spending was distributed across publishers and journal titles. According to self-reported data from 30 German universities and research organisations between 2005 and 2015, expenditures on open access publication fees increased over the years in Germany and amounted to 9,627,537 for 7,417 open access journal articles. The average payment was 1,298, and the median was 1,231. A total of 94% of the total article volume included in the study was supported in accordance with the price cap of 2,000, a limit imposed by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) as part of its funding activities for open access funding at German universities. Expenditures varied considerably at the institutional level. There were also differences in how much the institutions spent per journal and publisher. These differences reflect, at least in part, the varying pricing schemes in place including discounted publication fees. With an indexing coverage of 99%, Crossref thoroughly indexed the open access journals articles included in the study. A comparison with the related openly available cost data from Austria and the UK revealed that German universities and research organisations primarily funded articles in fully open access journals. By contrast, articles in hybrid journal accounted for the largest share of spending according to the Austrian and UK data. Fees paid for hybrid journals were on average more expensive than those paid for fully open access journals. How to cite this article Jahn et al. (2016), A study of institutional spending on open access publication fees in Germany. 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.3

2017

[194] UK ethnic minority cancer researchers: their origins, destinations and sex M. Begum, ..., and G. Lewison International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics 2017 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

2.7

2011

[195] Special features of historical papers from the viewpoint of bibliometrics W. Marx J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2011 - 37 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

2.2

2022

[196] Charting variety, scope, and impact of open access diamond journals in various disciplines and regions: a survey-based observational study No author found Science Editing 2022 - 5 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2019

[197] Discovering Open Access Engineering Journals J. Bierman Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 2019 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.8

2021

[198] STEM Abstracting and Indexing (A&I) Tool Overlap Analysis in 2020: An Open Science Informed Approach Amid Pandemic Budgets Joshua D. Borycz, ..., and Honora Eskridge Journal of eScience Librarianship 2021 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

0.1%

1.3

2008

[199] Reference Accuracy: Best Practices for Making the Links Carol Anne Meyer Journal of Electronic Publishing 2008 - 21 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: eference citations in scholarly publishing have never been more important than in the age of electronic distribution. Not only do references cite relevant previous work, they also provide one of the most valuable functions in electronic publishing—an actionable, clickable link to more information about the citation. The link may be to additional metadata in a secondary source or to the full text of the cited reference from a library collection or a publisher Web site. Actionable reference links are just the tip of an interconnected scholarly communication system. Almost from the earliest days of electronic publishing, publishers have worked toward an interlinked body of knowledge and have envisioned links to gene sequences, chemical structures, multimedia, and Web site data in addition to the journal literature. 1 Increasingly, scholars are making their data available through databases such as GenBank. In some fields, journals are beginning to require authors to submit data sets to these data depositories. Links between the literature and the data will enhance the value of each. The measurable impact of new publishing models, such as institutional repositories, will also increasingly depend on linking the content to other sources. 2 Studies of open access journals have compared the impact of journals accessible under traditional subscription models with those that are free to readers. 3 The measurements of impact frequently rely on citation analysis; thus, any problems with reference accuracy can underestimate the impact of an author's work or of a journal ISI's impact factor was the original measure of citation analysis to evaluate journal quality. The impact factor and more recently developed citation measures, such as the h-index, provide input to a host of decisions—from library journal selection, to tenure, to appointments, to grants. Citation analysis remains a growing and important part of the environment, 4 available not just through Thomson's Web of Science and Citation Indexes, but also through comprehensive tools such as Scopus from Elsevier, Google Scholar, 5,6 and discipline-specific secondary services such as the Smithsonian/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS). 7 Clearly, reference citations are critical, enabling measurability and discoverability. The problem, of course, is that reference quality and accuracy have been a known issue in journal publishing for many years. Even before the dawn of electronic distribution, periodic reference studies exposed sloppy reference work and exhorted authors and journal publishers to do better. 8 Such studies continue in a number of fields and report reference errors … 0.1% topic match

0.1%

10.4

2013

[200] Studying scientific migration in Scopus H. Moed, ..., and A. Plume Scientometrics 2013 - 122 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

16.6

2020

[201] The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature J. Ioannidis, ..., and Jeroen Baas Royal Society Open Science 2020 - 65 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.9

2018

[202] Accuracy of affiliation information in Microsoft Academic: Implications for institutional level research evaluation B. Ranjbar-Sahraei, ..., and Jong R. de Journal Not Provided 2018 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

18.3

2022

[203] Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals M. Thelwall and Pardeep Sud Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 52 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

7.2

2020

[204] Open access publishers: The new players R. Rodrigues, ..., and Breno Kricheldorf Hermes de Araújo PLoS ONE 2020 - 32 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2024

[205] Bibliometric study of scientific production in music education from 2000 to 2022 Judith Sánchez-Marroquí and Gregorio Vicente-Nicolás International Journal of Music Education 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

27.8

1991

[206] Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science A. Zahar Medical History 1991 - 935 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2024

[207] Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Sustainable Management of Forest Ecosystems: A Systematic Review C. P. Kpadé, ..., and M. Lamhamedi Forests 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

2.0

2019

[208] The Lens MetaRecord and LensID: An open identifier system for aggregated metadata and versioning of knowledge artefacts O. Jefferson, ..., and Richard A Jefferson https://doi.org/10.31229/osf.io/t56yh 2019 - 10 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

8.2

2009

[209] Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories Xavier Ochoa and Erik Duval International Journal on Digital Libraries 2009 - 122 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

30.6

2020

[210] Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data C. Herzog, ..., and Stacy Konkiel Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 147 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

58.1

2012

[211] Predatory publishers are corrupting open access J. Beall Nature 2012 - 707 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

12.7

2020

[212] Academic Knowledge Production and the Global South Márton Demeter https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52701-3 2020 - 62 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

17.3

2020

[213] A scientometric overview of CORD-19 Giovanni Colavizza, ..., and L. Waltman PLoS ONE 2020 - 79 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

12.2

2021

[214] Guidance for using artificial intelligence for title and abstract screening while conducting knowledge syntheses Candyce Hamel, ..., and B. Hutton BMC Medical Research Methodology 2021 - 36 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2003

[215] Ranking the Research Productivity of Library and Information Science Faculty and Schools : An Evaluation of Data Sources and Research Methods Lokman I. Meho and Kristina M. Spurgin Journal Not Provided 2003 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

7.2

2004

[216] Measuring science Z. Shah BMJ : British Medical Journal 2004 - 150 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

31.5

2018

[217] Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation Daniel W. Hook, ..., and C. Herzog Frontiers Res. Metrics Anal. 2018 - 196 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

3.4

2019

[218] The demography of the peripatetic researcher: Evidence on highly mobile scholars from the Web of Science Samin Aref, ..., and Jevin D. West Social Informatics 2019 - 18 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

7.5

2018

[219] Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence R. Bashir, ..., and A. Dunn Systematic Reviews 2018 - 45 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2024

[220] Why do some academic articles receive more citations from policy communities? Ji Ma and Y. Cheng Public Administration Review 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

3.7

2017

[221] Last name analysis of mobility, gender imbalance, and nepotism across academic systems J. Grilli and S. Allesina Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2017 - 27 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

0.1%

4.5

1971

[222] Brain Drain from Developing Countries A. Parthasarathi Nature 1971 - 239 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

2.2

2024

[223] Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lens Alaa Tarazi High Yield Medical Reviews 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

5.1

2019

[224] The impact of Hurricane Maria on out-migration from Puerto Rico: Evidence from Facebook data M. Alexander, ..., and Kivan Polimis https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/39s6c 2019 - 30 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2008

[225] Trzech uczonych, trzy bazy, jeden bibliotekarz. O pożytkach i metodzie uczelnianej analizy cytowań. Hanna Celoch Journal Not Provided 2008 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

9.0

2013

[226] The NLM Medical Text Indexer System for Indexing Biomedical Literature James G. Mork, ..., and A. Aronson Journal Not Provided 2013 - 107 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

3.7

2023

[227] Model-Based System Engineering of the Internet of Things: A Bibliometric Literature Analysis Ehsan Ahmad IEEE Access 2023 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

0.1%

24.4

2023

[228] How big is science’s fake-paper problem? Richard Van Noorden Nature 2023 - 25 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

1.2

2023

[229] Document Types Indexed in WoS and Scopus: Similarities, Differences, and Their Significance in the Analysis of Publication Activity Yuliya Mokhnacheva Scientific and Technical Information Processing 2023 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.8

2014

[230] A bibliometric approach to tracking international scientific migration H. Moed and Gali Halevi Scientometrics 2014 - 8 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

8.3

2010

[231] Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology M. García‐Pérez J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2010 - 123 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

4.8

2015

[232] Fee Waivers for Open Access Journals Stuart Lawson Publ. 2015 - 45 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

30.3

2020

[233] A Bibliometric Analysis of COVID-19 across Science and Social Science Research Landscape Aleksander Aristovnik, ..., and Lan Umek Sustainability 2020 - 133 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

7.9

1995

[234] Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information's journal impact factors H. Moed and T. V. Leeuwen Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 1995 - 233 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

113.7

2020

[235] Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity C. Birkle, ..., and Jonathan Adams Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 547 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

4.2

2020

[236] Special issue on bibliographic data sources L. Waltman and V. Larivière Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 20 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

0.1%

10.6

2021

[237] Predatory publishers’ latest scam: bootlegged and rebranded papers Kyle Siler, ..., and V. Larivière Nature 2021 - 33 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

2.4

2017

[238] Open access publishing in Africa: advancing research outputs to global visibility Ifeanyi J. Ezema and O. B. Onyancha African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science 2017 - 19 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

4.6

2013

[239] Dealing with metadata quality: The legacy of digital library efforts A. Tani, ..., and D. Castelli Inf. Process. Manag. 2013 - 51 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

4.5

2021

[240] Over‐promotion and caution in abstracts of preprints during the COVID‐19 crisis Frédérique Bordignon, ..., and Marianne Noel Learned Publishing 2021 - 15 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2024

[241] Risk Management of High-Rise Buildings in Coastal Areas: A Bibliometric Review Using Vosviewer Rahmat Hermawan, ..., and Susanty Handayani Return : Study of Management, Economic and Bussines 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.9

2018

[242] Evolution of systems engineering scholarship from 2000 to 2015, with particular emphasis on software S. Sheard Systems Engineering 2018 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2014

[243] Metadata and Open Access: Reliably Finding Content and Finding Reliable Content Sommer Browning, ..., and Laurie Kaplan https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284315314 2014 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

10.4

2014

[244] A bibliometric approach to tracking international scientific migration H. Moed and Gali Halevi Scientometrics 2014 - 104 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

11.1

2006

[245] Interlinkages between internal and international migration and development in the Asian region R. Skeldon Population Space and Place 2006 - 210 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: This paper examines the linkages between systems of internal migration and systems of international migration in the Asian region. In the context of changing global patterns of international migration on the one hand and urbanization on the other, the paper briefly examines the evolution of two different traditions in migration research and policy: those concerned with international and those concerned with internal migration. Recognizing that there is some blurring in any distinction between the two types of migration, the paper hypothesizes that there are sufficient differences between the two systems to warrant separate identification. Although both can operate simultaneously, the paper goes on to posit two scenarios: that internal migration can lead to international migration; and that international migration can lead to internal migration. Evidence from various parts of South and East Asia is employed to examine the validity of these statements. There is no single evolutionary path and examples of both scenarios are found in Asia. The concentration of populations in urban areas can give rise to later international movements but these international migrations themselves, by creating vacuums in areas of origin, can in turn generate internal migration. The history of colonial contact, too, can initiate international migration from particular areas, not necessarily just urban, that give rise to later internal movements. Although there is no simple evolutionary path, internal and international migrations are integrated and it is necessary to consider them as a unified system rather than in isolation. The hierarchical movements link richer and poorer groups together and need to be understood in the context of the implementation of programmes of poverty alleviation. By attempting to link internal and international migration, this paper is a small step towards the creation of a more integrated framework for the study of population movement. 0.1% topic match

0.1%

None

[246] Analysing the Bibliometric of Circular Economy and Customer Behavior: A Study from 2018 to 2023 A. Menaga, ..., and S. Lokesh Journal Not Provided None - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2019

[247] Large dataset of disambiguated publication profiles for studying researcher mobility A. Petersen https://doi.org/10.6071/m3vm1d 2019 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2023

[248] Evolution of funding for collaborative health research towards higher-level patient-oriented research. A comparison of the European Union Framework Programmes to the program funding by the United States National Institutes of Health David Fajardo-Ortiz, ..., and K. Sipido Journal Not Provided 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

6.5

2017

[249] Document type assignment accuracy in the journal citation index data of Web of Science P. Donner Scientometrics 2017 - 46 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

16.2

2022

[250] Open science, done wrong, will compound inequities Tony Ross-Hellauer Nature 2022 - 44 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2018

[251] proposal Suitable Bibliographic s Platfoms for avaluating teh Cuban scientific out pur :: Brapci 2.0 I. A. Lozano-Díaz Journal Not Provided 2018 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

9.5

2014

[252] Developing an effective market for Open Access Article Processing Charges Kiley Robert https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.951966.v2 2014 - 102 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

1.6

2014

[253] Fellowships: Turning brain drain into brain circulation T. Wiesel Nature 2014 - 17 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

1.2

2020

[254] Open Abstracts: Where are we? L. Waltman https://doi.org/10.5555/6VS5EN6 2020 - 5 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2018

[255] Dissecting PubMed: which content is covered by the Library? and Open Access? P. Iriarte and F. Muller Journal Not Provided 2018 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

11.6

2015

[256] A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus H. Moed, ..., and Gali Halevi J. Informetrics 2015 - 103 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

2.0

2020

[257] Applications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in COVID-19 Research: A Bibliometric Study Mahbub Hossain, ..., and P. Ma https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0161.v1 2020 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

79.0

2019

[258] Human Mortality Database Dmitri A. Jdanov, ..., and M. Barbieri Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging 2019 - 464 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

2.5

2021

[259] Technologies for recovery and reuse of plant nutrients from human excreta and domestic wastewater: a protocol for a systematic map and living evidence platform Biljana Macura, ..., and R. Harder Environmental Evidence 2021 - 8 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.7

2014

[260] The crossroads of academic electronic availability: how well does Google Scholar measure up against a university-based metadata system in 2014? N. Karlsson Current Science 2014 - 8 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

4.3

2022

[261] Bilateral international migration flow estimates updated and refined by sex G. Abel and J. Cohen Scientific Data 2022 - 11 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

2.4

2024

[262] An open dataset of article processing charges from six large scholarly publishers (2019-2023) Leigh-Ann Butler, ..., and Stefanie Haustein ArXiv 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

162.1

2020

[263] Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies Jeroen Baas, ..., and Reza Karimi Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 780 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

2.1

2016

[264] Document Type Classification in Online Digital Libraries Cornelia Caragea, ..., and C. Lee Giles AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2016 - 18 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

17.1

2008

[265] Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study Ylva Gavel and Lars Iselid Online Inf. Rev. 2008 - 286 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

14.8

2009

[266] Open Access and Global Participation in Science James A. Evans and Jacob Reimer Science 2009 - 233 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.8

2022

[267] The interplay of migration and cultural similarity between countries: Evidence from Facebook data on food and drink interests C. C. Vieira, ..., and Filipe Nunes Ribeiro PLoS ONE 2022 - 5 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

5.5

2003

[268] Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help? G. Laudel Scientometrics 2003 - 119 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2024

[269] Is the scientific impact of the LIS themes gender-biased? A bibliometric analysis of the evolution, scientific impact, and relative contribution by gender from 2007 to 2022 Thamyres T. Choji, ..., and J. A. Moral-Munoz Scientometrics 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

1.7

2000

[270] An Analysis of Document Types Published in Journals Related to Physics: Proceeding Papers Recorded in the Science Citation Index Database A. Sigogneau Scientometrics 2000 - 41 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.9

2022

[271] AI-SPedia: a novel ontology to evaluate the impact of research in the field of artificial intelligence Yasser Maatouk PeerJ Computer Science 2022 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: Background Sharing knowledge such as resources, research results, and scholarly documents, is of key importance to improving collaboration between researchers worldwide. Research results from the field of artificial intelligence (AI) are vital to share because of the extensive applicability of AI to several other fields of research. This has led to a significant increase in the number of AI publications over the past decade. The metadata of AI publications, including bibliometrics and altmetrics indicators, can be accessed by searching familiar bibliographical databases such as Web of Science (WoS), which enables the impact of research to be evaluated and identify rising researchers and trending topics in the field of AI. Problem description In general, bibliographical databases have two limitations in terms of the type and form of metadata we aim to improve. First, most bibliographical databases, such as WoS, are more concerned with bibliometric indicators and do not offer a wide range of altmetric indicators to complement traditional bibliometric indicators. Second, the traditional format in which data is downloaded from bibliographical databases limits users to keyword-based searches without considering the semantics of the data. Proposed solution To overcome these limitations, we developed a repository, named AI-SPedia. The repository contains semantic knowledge of scientific publications concerned with AI and considers both the bibliometric and altmetric indicators. Moreover, it uses semantic web technology to produce and store data to enable semantic-based searches. Furthermore, we devised related competency questions to be answered by posing smart queries against the AI-SPedia datasets. Results The results revealed that AI-SPedia can evaluate the impact of AI research by exploiting knowledge that is not explicitly mentioned but extracted using the power of semantics. Moreover, a simple analysis was performed based on the answered questions to help make research policy decisions in the AI domain. The end product, AI-SPedia, is considered the first attempt to evaluate the impacts of AI scientific publications using both bibliometric and altmetric indicators and the power of semantic web technology. 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

13.2

2020

[272] Transformative agreements: Do they pave the way to open access? Á. Borrego, ..., and Ernest Abadal Learned Publishing 2020 - 52 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

10.6

2022

[273] Rethinking English as a lingua franca in scientific-academic contexts Federico Navarro, ..., and Désirée Motta-Roth Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 2022 - 26 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

22.9

2017

[274] Scientists have most impact when they're free to move Cassidy R. Sugimoto, ..., and V. Larivière Nature 2017 - 163 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

35.5

2017

[275] Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort. James Thomas, ..., and Julian H. Elliott Journal of clinical epidemiology 2017 - 250 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

14.1

2019

[276] The Future of OA: A large-scale analysis projecting Open Access publication and readership Heather A. Piwowar, ..., and Richard Orr bioRxiv 2019 - 72 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

65.4

2020

[277] COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected J. Andersen, ..., and R. Jagsi eLife 2020 - 289 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

11.9

2015

[278] A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus Juan Carlos Valderrama Zurián, ..., and R. Aleixandre-Benavent J. Informetrics 2015 - 112 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

15.7

2017

[279] Comparison of metadata quality in open data portals using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Sylvain Kubler, ..., and Y. L. Traon Gov. Inf. Q. 2017 - 109 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.4

2022

[280] Local emergence, global expansion: understanding the structural evolution of a bi-lingual national research landscape M. Milia, ..., and R. Arvanitis Scientometrics 2022 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

2.0

2024

[281] Exploring over a decade of systems engineering research center: A community detection and text analytics approach Araceli Zavala, ..., and Jose E. Ramirez Marquez Systems Engineering 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

28.6

2010

[282] ‘Mind the Gap!’ Integrating Approaches to Internal and International Migration Russell King and R. Skeldon Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 2010 - 411 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

4.1

2020

[283] Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups Aliakbar Akbaritabar, ..., and F. Squazzoni Scientometrics 2020 - 18 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

12.2

2004

[284] The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting Thomas R. Bruce and Diane Hillmann Journal Not Provided 2004 - 254 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

None

[285] Investigating missing citations in COCI and publishers involved A. Cioffi, ..., and Nooshin Shahidzadeh Asadi Journal Not Provided None - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2023

[286] Effect of employee`s religious and cultural values on their sustainable behavior: A Systematic Approach to the Literature Salman Hameed and D. Siddiqui International Journal of Social Science & Entrepreneurship 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

99.6

2020

[287] Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough Kuansan Wang, ..., and Anshul Kanakia Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 479 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

3.1

2020

[288] A Paywall Coming Down, Another Being Erected: Open Access Article Processing Charges (APC) may Prevent Some Researchers from Publishing in Leading Journals F. Fontúrbel and J. Vizentin‐Bugoni Bulletin of The Ecological Society of America 2020 - 15 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

10.9

2020

[289] Combining Social Media and Survey Data to Nowcast Migrant Stocks in the United States M. Alexander, ..., and E. Zagheni Population Research and Policy Review 2020 - 51 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

3.3

2022

[290] The Components of Change in Population Growth Rates. V. Canudas-Romo, ..., and Collin F. Payne Demography 2022 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

2.2

2023

[291] Sustainable Development and Tourism: A Review of the Literature in WoS from 2001 to 2020 Alma Rocío García-García, ..., and Sacnicté Valdez-del Río Sustainability 2023 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

4.0

2024

[292] The road to sustainability: Examining key drivers in open access diamond journal publishing JungWon Yoon, ..., and Eunkyung Chung Learned Publishing 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

14.6

2019

[293] Bilateral international migration flow estimates for 200 countries G. Abel and J. Cohen Scientific Data 2019 - 79 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

3.2

2019

[294] Missing documents in Scopus: the case of the journal Enfermeria Nefrologica E. Krauskopf Scientometrics 2019 - 18 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.1

1984

[295] The review article in MEDLINE: ambiguity of definition and implications for online searchers. N. V. Van Buskirk Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 1984 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

25.2

2018

[296] Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries Emanuel Kulczycki, ..., and Alesia A. Zuccala Scientometrics 2018 - 167 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

6.0

2015

[297] Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future D. Stuart Online Inf. Rev. 2015 - 55 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

4.6

2021

[298] The OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 2: Recommendations A. Becerril, ..., and D. Torny https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4562790 2021 - 17 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2023

[299] Mapping regional funding for COVID-19 research in the Asia-Pacific region E. Antonio, ..., and Alice Norton BMJ Global Health 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Introduction The Global Research Collaboration for Infectious Disease Preparedness (GloPID-R) is a network of funders supporting research on infectious diseases of epidemic/pandemic potential. GloPID-R is establishing regional hubs to strengthen stakeholder engagement particularly among low-income and middle-income countries. The first pilot hub, led from Republic of Korea (South Korea), has been launched in the Asia-Pacific region, a region highly prone to outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases. We present findings of mapping research undertaken in support of the hub’s development. Methods We analysed five COVID-19 research databases in September 2022 to identify research funders and intermediary funding sources supporting research in infectious diseases in the Asia-Pacific region. This was complemented with an in-depth analysis of the UK Collaborative on Development Research (UKCDR) and GloPID-R COVID-19 Research Project Tracker to assess the alignment of funded projects in the region to the WHO COVID-19 research priorities. Results We identified 453 funders and funding sources supporting COVID-19 research in the Asia-Pacific Region including public, private and philanthropic organisations and universities. However, these organisations were clustered in few countries in the region. The in-depth analysis of the UKCDR and GloPID-R COVID-19 Research project Tracker found limited research involving Asia-Pacific countries with the 117 funders supporting these projects investing at least US$604m in COVID-19 research in the region. Social Sciences was the dominant theme on which funded projects focused whereas the priority areas with the least number of projects were research on ‘animal and environmental health’ and ‘ethics considerations for research’. Conclusion Our analyses show the diversity of funding sources for research on infectious diseases in the Asia-Pacific region. Engagement between multiple actors in the health research system is likely to promote enhanced coordination for greater research impact. GloPID-R’s Asia-Pacific regional hub aims to support activities for the enhancement of preparedness for outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases in the region. 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2017

[300] The open citations revolution S. Peroni https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.5522143.V1 2017 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

12.4

2019

[301] Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics A. Raan https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_10 2019 - 73 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

4.0

2023

[302] Scholarly article retrieval from Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis of retrieval quality Prashasti Singh, ..., and Rajesh Piryani Journal of Information Science 2023 - 5 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

147.0

2019

[303] Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses M. Linnenluecke, ..., and Abhay K. Singh Australian Journal of Management 2019 - 752 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

26.0

2020

[304] Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata Ginny Hendricks, ..., and P. Feeney Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 125 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

81.5

2006

[305] Mind the gap A. Amir and Seth Pettie Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2006 - 1537 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.9

2013

[306] Some differences in research publications of Indian scientists in India and the diaspora, 1986–2010 Aparna Basu Scientometrics 2013 - 10 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.2

2022

[307] As línguas e rankings no Oscar da internacionalização das produções científicas latino-americanas K. Finardi Estudos Linguísticos (São Paulo. 1978) 2022 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

3.4

2024

[308] Research and Trends of Filtration for Removing Microplastics in Freshwater Environments Marchel Putra Garfansa, ..., and Yenni Arista Cipta Ekalaturrahmah Environmental Quality Management 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

3.3

2006

[309] Accuracy of Cited References: The Role of Citation Databases R. Buchanan College & Research Libraries 2006 - 61 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.6

2024

[310] Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money? G. Kendall Quantitative Science Studies 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[311] Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis M. Sharp, ..., and Barbara Clyne HRB Open Research 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: Background Scientific publications have been growing exponentially, contributing to an oversaturated information environment. Quantifying a research output’s impact and reach cannot be solely measured by traditional metrics like citation counts as these have a lag time and are largely focused on an academic audience. There is increasing recognition to consider ‘alternative metrics’ or altmetrics to measure more immediate and broader impacts of research. Better understanding of altmetrics can help researchers better navigate evolving information environments and changing appetites for different types of research. Objectives Our study aims to: 1) analyse the amount and medium of Altmetric coverage of health research produced by Irish organisations (2017 – 2023), identifying changes over time and 2) investigate differences in the amount of coverage between clinical areas (e.g., nutrition vs. neurology). Methods Using Altmetric institutional access, we will gather data on research outputs published 1 January 2017 through 31 December 2023 from active Irish organisations with Research Organisation Registry (ROR) IDs. Outputs will be deduplicated and stratified by their Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification relating to ≥1 field of health research: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Health Sciences, and Psychology. We will clean data using R and perform descriptive analyses, establishing counts and frequencies of coverage by clinical area and medium (e.g., traditional news, X, etc.); data will be plotted on a yearly and quarterly basis where appropriate. Results and Conclusions Improved understanding of one’s information environment can help researchers better navigate their local landscapes and identify pathways for more effective communication to the public. All R code will be made available open-source, allowing researchers to adapt it to evaluate their local landscapes. 0.0% topic match

0.0%

4.4

2017

[312] Gold Open Access Publishing in Mega-Journals: Developing Countries Pay the Price of Western Premium Academic Output J. Ellers, ..., and Jeffrey A. Harvey Journal of Scholarly Publishing 2017 - 31 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

9.4

2021

[313] The OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 1: Findings J. Bosman, ..., and V. Proudman https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4558704 2021 - 35 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

4.1

2018

[314] OpenAPC: a contribution to a transparent and reproducible monitoring of fee-based open access publishing across institutions and nations D. Pieper and Christoph Broschinski Insights: The UKSG Journal 2018 - 25 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

8.0

2022

[315] Why I think ending article-processing charges will save open access Juan Pablo Alperin Nature 2022 - 17 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

28.3

2013

[316] The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals B. Björk and D. Solomon J. Informetrics 2013 - 315 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.6

2021

[317] Comprehensive mapping of local and diaspora scientists: a database and analysis of 63951 Greek scientists J. Ioannidis, ..., and Jeroen Baas bioRxiv 2021 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[318] A comprehensive review of recent advances in research on COVID in communication studies Barbara Cyrek and Jenna Peltonen Discover Public Health 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2023

[319] BRAPCI Explorer Rafael Gutierres Castanha and Francielle Franco dos Santos RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.8

2023

[320] Which database with article processing charges should be used? S. Asai Scientometrics 2023 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

20.2

2022

[321] Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research Lin Zhang, ..., and G. Sivertsen Scientometrics 2022 - 50 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

2.9

2024

[322] How to measure interdisciplinary research? A systemic design for the model of measurement G. Cantone Scientometrics 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

None

[323] Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation H. Moed https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3714-7 None - 1364 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

26.0

2023

[324] The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges Leigh-Ann Butler, ..., and Stefanie Haustein Quantitative Science Studies 2023 - 27 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

2024

[325] core_api_client: An API for the CORE aggregation service for open access papers Domen Vake, ..., and Jernej Vičič SoftwareX 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

2.2

2024

[326] Trends and Issues of Inquiry and Socio-Scientific Issue (SSI) Research in the Last 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis M. Noris, ..., and S. Yamtinah International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

2.9

2023

[327] Context-aware citation recommendation of scientific papers: comparative study, gaps and trends Chaker Jebari, ..., and M. Cobo Scientometrics 2023 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2023

[328] Evaluating early pandemic response through length-of-stay analysis of case logs and epidemiological modeling: A case study of Singapore in early 2020 Jaya Sreevalsan-Nair, ..., and Pritesh Rajesh Ghogale Computational and Mathematical Biophysics 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

7.1

2020

[329] Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model? Nina Schönfelder Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 34 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

32.9

2006

[330] How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. Julie May Glanville, ..., and J. Camosso-Stefinovic Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA 2006 - 612 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

17.8

2022

[331] How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited M. Teplitskiy, ..., and K. Lakhani Research Policy 2022 - 51 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

3.2

2022

[332] La batalla de las lenguas en la publicación nacional: un estudio comparativo de las publicaciones del CNPq (Brasil) y Conicet (Argentina) Fernanda Beigel and L. Digiampietri Tempo Social 2022 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

18.4

2015

[333] Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access Ralf Schimmer, ..., and A. Vogler ScienceOpen Research 2015 - 176 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

27.2

2005

[334] Frontiers Sue Silver The Classical Review 2005 - 536 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: In 1994 C. R. Whittaker published a book on Frontiers of the Roman Empire. A Social and Economic Study (Baltimore and London). In it he suggested that the Roman frontiers were to be regarded as zones of cultural and economic interchange rather than as linear barriers (cf. his chapter in CAH XI2 [2000], 293–319): for favourable reviews see CR 45 (1995), 338–9; JRS 85 (1995), 292. Routledge has now issued a welcome collection of ten later articles on the subject (and on Rome’s relations with India), seven of which have been published previously. Chapter 1, ‘Where Are the Roman Frontiers Now?’ (pp. 1–27) develops ideas presented in his earlier work and analyses recent contributions by other scholars. He deμnes a limes as ‘the land that forms the furthest extent of a country’s settled or inhabited region’ (p. 6). This suits developed limites but does not take into account the original sense of limes as a road driven into hostile territory for military advance (referred to on pp. 69 and 80): cf. Cicero’s remark (Pis. 38) that the ‘μnes prouinciae’ were where the soldiers’ swords were. However, the chapter is a useful and up-to-date presentation of current thinking on Roman frontiers. Chapter 2, ‘Grand Strategy or Just a Grand Debate?’ (pp. 28–49), addresses E. N. Luttwak’s The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire (Baltimore and London, 1976). W. rejects L.’s theory of a centrally directed evolution of the frontiers in favour of intermittent reaction to crises: the infrastructure hardly allowed much more (p. 34: ‘make others slaves’ seems too strong a translation of ‘instrumenta seruitutis’ in Tac. Agr. 14; the meaning seems rather to be that Cogidubnus, though a king, was just treated as a cog in the process of subjection). Chapter 3, ‘The Importance of the Invasions of the Later Roman Empire’ (pp. 50–62), maintains that traditional scholarship has exaggerated the impact of the Barbarian Invasions on the empire. Chapter 4, ‘Mental Maps and Frontiers’ (pp. 63–87), is concerned with the state of geography in the Empire. In fact, generals operated not with maps but linear itineraries. (p. 81: Velleius does not ‘give the distance between the Rhine and the Elbe as 400 miles’; what he said was that Tiberius marched 400 miles from the Rhine to the mouth of the Elbe.) In Chapter 5, ‘Supplying the Army: The Evidence of Vindolanda’ (pp. 88–114), W. asks whether the Vindolanda Tablets throw any light on the question of army supply. His conclusion is that they provide little new evidence and that it appears that there was no uniform system. (p. 105: Treuerus should read Treuer; p. 111: Classis Germanicus . . . Britannicus should read Germanica . . . Britannica; p. 112: quaestururam should read quaesturam.) Chapter 6, ‘Sex on the Frontiers’ (pp. 115–43), treats two topics, the Roman custom of portraying conquered peoples as young women, and the presence of women on the frontiers and in the camps. On the μrst, it would have been better to distinguish more sharply between digniμed personiμcations of female provinces and the weeping μgures of post-conquest prouincia capta coins, and to have analysed the Britannia and the Armenia reliefs at Aphrodisias especially with reference to the second type rather than the μrst. The evidence for women in the camps is mounting (that of the Vindonissa Tablets should have been added): for a recent discussion see B. Pferdehirt, Die Rolle des Militärs für den sozialen Aufstieg . . . (Mainz, 2002), pp. 192–228 (p. 118: Claudius did not ‘receive the title of Germanicus when his uncle, the Elder Drusus, triumphed’. Drusus was his father, and Claudius only took the title on the death of his brother    261 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.3

2022

[335] Which Publications' Metadata Are in Which Bibliographic Databases? A System for Exploration Michael Färber, ..., and Kristian Noullet Journal Not Provided 2022 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

2.5

2019

[336] Le français, langue seconde ? De l'évolution des lieux et langues de publication des chercheurs au Québec, en France et en Allemagne Vincent Larivière Recherche 2019 - 14 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

188.0

2018

[337] Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories Alberto Martín-Martín, ..., and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar J. Informetrics 2018 - 1175 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.8

2023

[338] Connecting with Future Talent: A Review of Employer Value Propositions and Digital Media Channels for Sustainable Companies Targeting Generations Y and Z J. Teori, ..., and Kristia Jurnal Manajemen Teori dan Terapan | Journal of Theory and Applied Management 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Objective: This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the employer value proposition of ethical and sustainable companies and the effective digital media channels that sustainable companies can use to attract and communicate with Generation Y and Z candidates. Design/Methods/Approach: The PRISMA systematic literature review method was combined with content analysis of selected articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The selected articles were limited to those published within the last six years and in English. Findings: This study found that sustainable companies need to offer a corporate value proposition that prioritizes clear career progression, work-life balance, a supportive work atmosphere, and ethical aspects, such as reducing carbon footprint and promoting diversity and inclusion. These values are essential to Generations Y and Z, although the priority dimensions of their value propositions may differ. Companies utilize Digital media channels, including owned digital media, paid digital media by using paid endorsers or enhanced profiles on career websites, and earned digital media such as honest reviews on job board platforms and private social media from employees. Originality/Value: This review adds to the existing literature by comprehensively discussing the combined issues of employer value proposition, generational differences, and sustainability. Practical/Policy implication: This review's findings have implications for business and research practice, as sustainable companies can use this information to develop the most relevant corporate value propositions and communication strategies for future targeted talent. Companies can attract and retain top personnel and establish a positive employer brand by effectively communicating their sustainability practices and values. Additional empirical research could investigate the impact of other demographic and psychographic factors on the preferences and priorities of job seekers. 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

16.4

2015

[339] Scientific Babel: How Science Was Done Before and After Global English M. Gordin https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.193754 2015 - 157 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

6.8

2024

[340] Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information A. Editorial Science Editor and Publisher 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

Research topic

Report

References

Select the format you want to download:

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS