Undermind - AI-Powered Scientific Research Assistant

Research topic

I want to find empirical papers comparing the completeness or accuracy of metadata in OpenAlex with other citation indexes or scholarly data sources, focusing on at least one aspect: availability or correctness of references, citations and their impact on citation searching, affiliations, or abstracts.

Report

Empirical Comparisons of Metadata Completeness and Accuracy

Focuses on studies directly comparing OpenAlex with other databases like Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions, assessing metadata completeness and accuracy (e.g., references, citations, affiliations, abstracts).
References: [1], [2], [3], [5], [6], [7], [8]
Details:
- [1] compares reference and additional metadata fields across OpenAlex, Web of Science, and Scopus.
- [2] evaluates OpenAlex's suitability for bibliometric analyses using Scopus as a benchmark.
- [3] provides a regional-specific comparison of African publications.
- [5] analyzes field-normalized citation scores across OpenAlex and other databases.
- [6] benchmarks abstract completeness across seven databases, including OpenAlex.
- [7] assesses metadata completeness in eight free-access databases.
- [8] examines bibliographic data conservation between Microsoft Academic Graph and OpenAlex.

Completeness versus Accuracy of Metadata

Discusses the balance and trade-offs between metadata completeness and accuracy in OpenAlex, without always offering direct comparisons with other databases.
References: [2], [9], [10]
Details:
- [2] highlights gaps in metadata accuracy within OpenAlex despite broader coverage.
- [9] addresses linguistic coverage accuracy and completeness in OpenAlex compared to Web of Science.
- [10] compares funder metadata completeness between OpenAlex and Dimensions.

Thematic and Geographic Inclusivity

Studies focused on how OpenAlex compares with other databases in terms of inclusivity and diversity, often highlighting broader coverage but varying metadata accuracy.
References: [3], [4], [13]
Details:
- [3] evaluates coverage and metadata for African publications, pointing out issues in affiliation metadata.
- [4] discusses inclusivity concerning scholar migration patterns but primarily compares affiliations.
- [13] covers publication distribution among publishers rather than detailed metadata aspects.

Methodological Comparisons and Specific Aspects

Explores specific methods used for metadata comparison, focusing on narrower aspects like document classification or bibliometric suitability, occasionally lacking broad empirical comparison.
References: [8], [11]
Details:
- [8] assesses metadata relevance for bibliometrics between OpenAlex and Microsoft Academic Graph.
- [11] compares publication and document type classification but does not focus deeply on metadata accuracy.

General Metadata Analysis without Direct Comparisons

Includes works that discuss metadata completeness and quality but do not directly compare OpenAlex with other databases.
References: [12], [14], [15]
Details:
- [12] evaluates publication metadata completeness in various databases quantitatively.
- [14] focuses on dataset citation dynamics within OpenAlex.
- [15] provides an online system to verify publication metadata across databases, lacking an empirical comparative angle.

These categories synthesize key findings and data relevant to evaluating OpenAlex's metadata completeness and accuracy in comparison with other scholarly databases, essential for understanding its utility and challenges in bibliometric research.

Timeline and Development of Ideas

Shift Toward Open Databases:
- The evolution of scholarly metadata began with a focus on proprietary databases like Web of Science and Scopus. The appearance of OpenAlex marks a significant shift toward open, community-assisted databases [1, 3]. This trend aligns with a broader movement for open access and transparency in scholarly communications.
Metadata Coverage and Inclusivity:
- Recent studies from 2023-2024 demonstrate a keen interest in assessing OpenAlex's ability to expand inclusivity and enhance coverage, particularly for underrepresented regions. Researchers such as Culbert et al. [1] and Alonso-Alvarez & van Eck [3] highlight OpenAlex's comparative strength in coverage while noting its limitations in metadata completeness.
Focus on Metadata Completeness and Accuracy:
- From 2023 onwards, there's a notable increase in empirical studies analyzing metadata fields (references, affiliations, language) within OpenAlex, comparing them with other databases [1, 2, 6]. This interest reflects a broader recognition of the role accurate metadata plays in effective bibliometric analysis.

Clusters of Research Groups and Key Contributors

Philipp Mayr and Collaborators:
- Consistent contributions to the field are evident from Philipp Mayr et al. [1, 11], focusing on empirical metadata analysis across multiple databases. Their work has been cited multiple times, indicating sustained impact.
Lorena Delgado-Quirós and José Luis Ortega:
- Their studies [6, 7, 12] contribute to the understanding of metadata completeness in free-access databases, providing insights into the comparative assessment of OpenAlex with other scholarly platforms.
Vincent Larivière and Collaborators:
- Active in evaluating metadata consistency and reference coverage, Larivière's work [9, 13] informs discussions about data quality across growing numbers of databases, including OpenAlex's impact on linguistic diversity and smaller publisher inclusion.

These researchers collectively contribute towards a comprehensive understanding of OpenAlex's place within the evolving landscape of citation indexes, emphasizing the balance between inclusivity and metadata accuracy.

Bokeh Application

References

Last 5 years

Last 2 years

> 1 citation per year

> 5 citations per year

Topic Match

Cit./Year

Year

Paper

Paper Relevance Summary

100.0%

10.0

2024

[1] Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus Jack H. Culbert, ..., and Philipp Mayr ArXiv 2024 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 100.0% topic match

Provides an empirical comparison of metadata coverage between OpenAlex, Web of Science, and Scopus. Analyzes reference coverage and additional metadata fields using a dataset of 16.8 million shared publications. Examines discrepancies in data accuracy and completeness, highlighting higher ORCID and lower abstract coverage by OpenAlex. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

99.6%

10.7

2024

[2] An analysis of the suitability of OpenAlex for bibliometric analyses J. Alperin, ..., and S. Haustein ArXiv 2024 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 99.6% topic match

Provides an empirical comparison of OpenAlex and Scopus metadata. Analyzes metadata accuracy and completeness, focusing on affiliations, references, and citations. Highlights OpenAlex's greater coverage but identifies metadata discrepancies needing further research. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

99.3%

0.0

2024

[3] Coverage and metadata availability of African publications in OpenAlex: A comparative analysis Patricia Alonso-Alvarez and Nees Jan van Eck ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 99.3% topic match

Provides an empirical comparison of metadata availability in OpenAlex vs. other citation indexes. Compares coverage and metadata (author, affiliations, references) of African publications in OpenAlex, Scopus, WoS, and AJOL. Highlights gaps in OpenAlex metadata accuracy/completeness, particularly affiliations and references, but needs focus on citation searching impact. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

98.7%

1.7

2023

[4] Global flows and rates of international migration of scholars Aliakbar Akbaritabar, ..., and E. Zagheni https://doi.org/10.4054/mpidr-wp-2023-018 2023 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 98.7% topic match

Compares author affiliations in Scopus and OpenAlex databases. Focuses on scholarly migration patterns and author identification methods with data on scholar flows and migration rates. Does not evaluate completeness or accuracy of references, citations, or abstracts in OpenAlex. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

97.7%

0.6

2023

[5] How similar are field-normalized scores from different free or commercial databases calculated for large German universities? T. Scheidsteger, ..., and L. Bornmann 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023) 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 97.7% topic match

Compares field-normalized scores from OpenAlex with commercial databases. Empirical study evaluates citation score concordance for 335,000 publications from German universities. Highlights differing agreements at paper and university levels; notes ecological fallacy in bibliometrics. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

96.9%

0.0

2023

[6] Comparing bibliographic descriptions in seven free-access databases Lorena Joaquina Delgado Quirós and J. Ortega 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023) 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 96.9% topic match

Provides empirical analysis on metadata completeness in OpenAlex. Compares metadata completeness of OpenAlex with six other databases using a sample of 116,648 DOIs. Focuses on completeness rather than correctness of citations, affiliations, or citation searching impacts. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

94.8%

8.0

2024

[7] Completeness degree of publication metadata in eight free-access scholarly databases Lorena Delgado-Quirós and José Luis Ortega Quantitative Science Studies 2024 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 94.8% topic match

Provides a quantitative comparison of metadata completeness in OpenAlex and other databases. Analyzes metadata fields like abstract availability and bibliographic information across eight scholarly databases, highlighting completeness differences. Focuses on completeness, not accuracy, lacking citations or affiliation impact discussion, thus partially aligned with the desired topic. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

91.1%

4.4

2022

[8] Comparison of metadata with relevance for bibliometrics between Microsoft Academic Graph and OpenAlex until 2020 T. Scheidsteger and R. Haunschild ArXiv 2022 - 11 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 91.1% topic match

Provides empirical comparison of metadata between MAG and OpenAlex. Examines metadata completeness and accuracy, focusing on document types and subject classifications. Focuses on OpenAlex comparisons with MAG, not with other citation indexes. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

84.8%

7.5

2024

[9] Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Luc'ia C'espedes, ..., and Vincent Larivière ArXiv 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 84.8% topic match

Provides empirical comparison of language metadata accuracy in OpenAlex vs. WoS. Shows OpenAlex has better linguistic coverage but inaccurate language metadata, impacting reference and categorization completeness. Includes manual validation and discusses metadata inconsistencies, but focuses solely on language rather than citations or affiliations. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

46.4%

1.5

2024

[10] Comparing Funder Metadata in OpenAlex and Dimensions Eric Schares OpenISU 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 46.4% topic match

Provides an empirical comparison of funder metadata completeness. Shows OpenAlex retrieves fewer funding records compared to Dimensions in NSF-related data. Focuses on funder metadata, not on references, citations, affiliations, or abstracts. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

22.9%

7.9

2024

[11] Analysis of the Publication and Document Types in OpenAlex, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed and Semantic Scholar Nick Haupka, ..., and Philipp Mayr ArXiv 2024 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 22.9% topic match

Compares publication and document types across databases. Focuses on classification inconsistencies in OpenAlex and other databases. Does not empirically compare metadata completeness or accuracy in references, citations, or affiliations. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

16.8%

None

[12] Quantitative comparison of publication metadata in eight free-access databases Lorena Delgado-Quirós and José Luis Ortega Journal Not Provided None - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 16.8% topic match

Provides a quantitative comparison of metadata completeness in several databases. Assesses seven characteristics to compare metadata quality, completeness, and agreement among databases, including OpenAlex. Highlights OpenAlex's superior metadata completeness compared to academic search engines, relevant for evaluating metadata availability.

12.8%

6.1

2024

[13] The oligopoly of academic publishers persists in exclusive database S. Bellen, ..., and Vincent Lariviere ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 12.8% topic match

Shows database inclusivity trends without assessing metadata accuracy. Analyzes article distribution across publishers in Web of Science, Dimensions, and OpenAlex. Lacks empirical comparison of metadata completeness or accuracy in OpenAlex vs other databases. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

11.0%

0.0

2023

[14] Who Re-Uses Data? A Bibliometric Analysis of Dataset Citations Geoff Krause, ..., and P. Mongeon ArXiv 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 11.0% topic match

Focuses on dataset citation patterns using OpenAlex data. Investigates creator-citer relationships and self-citation rates across various levels without cross-database comparisons. Does not empirically compare OpenAlex's metadata with other citation indexes, limiting its relevance to the specified topic. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

10.7%

0.3

2022

[15] Which Publications' Metadata Are in Which Bibliographic Databases? A System for Exploration Michael Färber, ..., and Kristian Noullet Journal Not Provided 2022 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 10.7% topic match

Provides a tool for checking publication metadata across databases. Describes "RefBee," which identifies missing publications in a selection of bibliographic databases for a given author. Focuses on metadata completeness across multiple databases, not specifically comparing OpenAlex with other citation indexes.

8.6%

64.1

2022

[16] OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts Jason Priem, ..., and Richard Orr ArXiv 2022 - 169 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 8.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

8.3%

0.0

2023

[17] Mapping bibliographic metadata collections: the case of OpenCitations Meta and OpenAlex Elia Rizzetto and Silvio Peroni Italian Research Conference on Digital Library Management Systems 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 8.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

8.1%

0.0

2024

[18] Growth of Science and Women: Methodological Challenges of Using Structured Big Data Marek Kwiek and Lukasz Szymula Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 8.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

6.5%

3.2

2021

[19] The prevalence and impact of university affiliation discrepancies between four bibliographic databases—Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, and Microsoft Academic P. Purnell Quantitative Science Studies 2021 - 11 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 6.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

6.3%

3.5

2022

[20] Assessing the quality of bibliographic data sources for measuring international research collaboration B. Nguyen, ..., and V. Larivière Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 8 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 6.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

6.0%

0.0

2023

[21] Web of Science Citation Gaps: An Automatic Approach to Detect Indexed but Missing Citations David Rodrigues, ..., and Fernando Batista Slate 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 6.0% topic match

5.6%

5.8

2023

[22] SemOpenAlex: The Scientific Landscape in 26 Billion RDF Triples Michael Färber, ..., and P. Haase ArXiv 2023 - 8 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 5.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

5.5%

19.7

2016

[23] Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science F. Franceschini, ..., and L. Mastrogiacomo J. Informetrics 2016 - 160 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 5.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

5.4%

0.0

2024

[24] On the Readiness of Scientific Data for a Fair and Transparent Use in Machine Learning Joan Giner-Miguelez, ..., and Jordi Cabot ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 5.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

5.0%

7.8

2023

[25] How are exclusively data journals indexed in major scholarly databases? An examination of four databases Chenyue Jiao, ..., and Zhichao Fang Scientific Data 2023 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 5.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

4.7%

0.6

2023

[26] Measuring Data Re-Use Through Dataset Citations in OpenAlex Geoff Krause and P. Mongeon 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023) 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 4.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

3.8%

4.3

2024

[27] openalexR: An R-Tool for Collecting Bibliometric Data from OpenAlex Massimo Aria, ..., and June Choe R J. 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 3.8% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

3.6%

0.0

2024

[28] The rise of Indo-German collaborative research: 1990-2022 Aasif Ahmad Mir, ..., and Philipp Mayr ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Purpose This study aims to highlight the growth and development of Indo-German collaborative research over the past three decades. Moreover, this study encompasses an in-depth examination of funding acknowledgements to gain valuable insights into the financial support that underpins these collaborative endeavours. Together with this paper, the authors provide an openly accessible data set of Indo-German research papers for further and reproducible research activities (the “Indo-German Literature Dataset”). Design/methodology/approach The data were retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database from the year 1990 till the 30th of November 2022. A total of 36,999 records were retrieved against the used query. Acknowledged entities were extracted using a named entity recognition (NER) model specifically trained for this task. Interrelations between the extracted entities and scientific domains, lengths of acknowledgement texts, number of authors and affiliations, number of citations and gender of the first author, as well as collaboration patterns between Indian and German funders were examined. Findings The study reveals a consistent and increasing growth in the publication trend over the years. The study brings to light that Physics, Chemistry, Materials Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Engineering prominently dominate the Indo-German collaborative research. The USA, followed by England and France, are the most active collaborators in Indian and German research. Largely, research was funded by major German and Indian funding agencies, international corporations and German and American universities. Associations between the first author’s gender and acknowledged entity were observed. Additionally, relations between entity, entity type and scientific domain were discovered. Practical implications The study paves the way for enhanced collaboration, optimized resource utilization and societal advantages by offering a profound comprehension of the intricacies inherent in research partnerships between India and Germany. Implementation of the insights gleaned from this study holds the promise of cultivating a more resilient and influential collaborative research ecosystem between the two nations. Originality/value The study highlights a deeper understanding of the composition of the Indo-German collaborative research landscape of the past 30 years and its significance in advancing scientific knowledge and fostering international partnerships. Furthermore, the authors provide an open version of the original WoS data set. The Indo-German Literature Data set consists of 22,844 papers from OpenAlex and is available for related studies like literature studies and scientometrics. 3.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

3.4%

5.7

2024

[29] Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices. Michael Gusenbauer Research synthesis methods 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite 3.4% topic match

3.2%

0.3

2021

[30] Open bibliographic data and the Italian National Scientific Qualification: Measuring coverage of academic fields Federica Bologna, ..., and Francesco Poggi Quantitative Science Studies 2021 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 3.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

3.0%

7.1

2024

[31] “O Author, Where Art Thou?” An Analysis of Affiliation Indexing in Canadian Journals and Bibliometric Research Potential Simon Van Bellen Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite 3.0% topic match

2.7%

6.8

2024

[32] Missing institutions in OpenAlex: possible reasons, implications, and solutions Lin Zhang, ..., and Ying Huang Scientometrics 2024 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite 2.7% topic match

2.6%

0.0

2024

[33] Anatomy of the top 1% most highly cited publications: An empirical comparison of two approaches Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez, ..., and Carlos Olmeda-Gómez Quantitative Science Studies 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.2%

15.4

2017

[34] Comparison of metadata quality in open data portals using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Sylvain Kubler, ..., and Y. L. Traon Gov. Inf. Q. 2017 - 109 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.1%

125.4

2020

[35] Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations Alberto Mart'in-Mart'in, ..., and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar Scientometrics 2020 - 583 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.9%

12.1

2022

[36] The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of Science I. Basson, ..., and V. Larivière PLoS ONE 2022 - 33 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.8%

3.1

2024

[37] Learning health systems and evidence ecosystems: a perspective on the future of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based guideline development D. Rajit, ..., and J. Enticott Health Research Policy and Systems 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.8% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.7%

2.2

2024

[38] Using Scopus and OpenAlex APIs to retrieve bibliographic data for evidence synthesis. A procedure based on Bash and SQL Robin Harder MethodsX 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.4%

11.5

2019

[39] Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus Nees Jan van Eck and L. Waltman ArXiv 2019 - 64 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.2%

0.7

2023

[40] How are exclusively data journals indexed in major scholarly databases? An examination of the Web of Science, Scopus, Dimensions, and OpenAlex Chenyue Jiao, ..., and Zhichao Fang ArXiv 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.2%

100.5

2015

[41] An Overview of Microsoft Academic Service (MAS) and Applications Arnab Sinha, ..., and Kuansan Wang Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web 2015 - 965 citations - Show abstract - Cite 1.2% topic match

1.1%

4.7

2015

[42] Evaluation of the citation matching algorithms of CWTS and iFQ in comparison to the Web of science Marlies Olensky, ..., and Nees Jan van Eck Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2015 - 44 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.1%

0.0

2024

[43] Dataset for bibliometric data-driven research team formation: Case of Politehnica University of Timisoara scholars for the interval 2010–2022 Christian-Daniel Curiac, ..., and A. Doboli Data in Brief 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 1.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.1%

3.7

2024

[44] How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements? N. Jahn ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.0%

0.0

2024

[45] Evolving interdisciplinary contributions to global societal challenges: A 50-year overview Keisuke Okamura Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.9%

8.5

2023

[46] The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing Thomas Klebel and Tony Ross-Hellauer Quantitative Science Studies 2023 - 16 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.8%

0.0

2024

[47] Measuring Data Re-Use In OpenAlex by Researchers, Institutions, and Countries Geoff Krause, ..., and Michael Smit Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.8% topic match

0.8%

0.0

2024

[48] Measuring Technological Convergence in Encryption Technologies with Proximity Indices: A Text Mining and Bibliometric Analysis using OpenAlex Alessandro Tavazzi, ..., and Alain Mermoud ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.8% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.7%

76.8

2018

[49] Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases Michael Gusenbauer Scientometrics 2018 - 470 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.6%

29.9

2020

[50] Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data C. Herzog, ..., and Stacy Konkiel Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 147 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.6%

90.7

2020

[51] Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic M. Visser, ..., and L. Waltman Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 416 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.6%

0.0

2024

[52] Uncovering the New Accessibility Crisis in Scholarly PDFs: Publishing Model and Platform Changes Contribute to Declining Scholarly Document Accessibility in the Last Decade Anukriti Kumar and Lucy Lu Wang ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

0.0

2024

[53] Scholar Metrics Scraper (SMS): automated retrieval of citation and author data Yutong Cao, ..., and Timothy H. Murphy Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

2.1

2024

[54] DyHANE: dynamic heterogeneous attributed network embedding through experience node replay Liliana Martirano, ..., and Andrea Tagarelli Appl. Netw. Sci. 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

0.5

2023

[55] Report of the G7 Open Science - Research on Research Sub-Working Group Mathieu Régnier and Marin Dacos https://doi.org/10.52949/32 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

0.0

2024

[56] Quantifying gendered citation imbalance in computer science conferences Kazuki Nakajima, ..., and George Fletcher ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

4.0

2024

[57] (Non-)retracted academic papers in OpenAlex Christian Hauschke and Serhii Nazarovets ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

2.2

2024

[58] Team careers in science: formation, composition and success of persistent collaborations Sandeep Chowdhary, ..., and Federico Battiston Journal Not Provided 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

1.9

2024

[59] biblioverlap: an R package for document matching across bibliographic datasets Gabriel Alves Vieira and J. Leta Scientometrics 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

4.6

2022

[60] Funding COVID-19 research: Insights from an exploratory analysis using open data infrastructures Alexis-Michel Mugabushaka, ..., and L. Waltman Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 13 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

2.6

2024

[61] A Few-Shot Approach for Relation Extraction Domain Adaptation using Large Language Models Vanni Zavarella, ..., and Sergio Consoli ArXiv 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2024

[62] Privately Learning from Graphs with Applications in Fine-tuning Large Language Models Haoteng Yin, ..., and Pan Li Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

9.8

2023

[63] unarXive 2022: All arXiv Publications Pre-Processed for NLP, Including Structured Full-Text and Citation Network T. Saier, ..., and Michael Färber 2023 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) 2023 - 17 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2023

[64] Streetlight Effect in Post-Publication Peer Review: Are Open Access Publications More Scrutinized? Abdelghani Maddi, ..., and Michel Dubois ArXiv 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

185.4

2020

[65] The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis V. Singh, ..., and Philipp Mayr Scientometrics 2020 - 768 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

57.6

2007

[66] Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar Lokman I. Meho and Kiduk Yang J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2007 - 1036 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: The Institute for Scientific Information’s (ISI) citation databases have been used for decades as a starting point and often as the only tools for locating citations and/or conducting citation analyses. ISI databases (or Web of Science [WoS]), however, may no longer be sufficient because new databases and tools that allow citation searching are now available. Using citations to the work of 25 library and information science faculty members as a case study, this paper examines the effects of using Scopus and Google Scholar (GS) on the citation counts and rankings of scholars as measured by WoS. Overall, more than 10,000 citing and purportedly citing documents were examined. Results show that Scopus significantly alters the relative ranking of those scholars that appear in the middle of the rankings and that GS stands out in its coverage of conference proceedings as well as international, non-English language journals. The use of Scopus and GS, in addition to WoS, helps reveal a more accurate and comprehensive picture of the scholarly impact of authors. WoS data took about 100 hours of collecting and processing time, Scopus consumed 200 hours, and GS a grueling 3,000 hours. INTRODUCTION Academic institutions, federal agencies, publishers, editors, authors, and librarians increasingly rely on citation analysis, along with publications assessment and expert opinions, for making hiring, promotion, tenure, funding, and/or reviewer and journal evaluation and selection decisions. In general, citation counts or rankings are considered partial indicators of research impact/quality, often used to support and/or question other indicators such as peer judgment (Borgman & Furner, 2002; Cronin, 1984; Holden, Rosenberg, & Barker, 2005; Moed, 2005; van Raan, 1996, 2005; Wallin, 2005). To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Many scholars have argued for and against the use of citations for assessing research impact or quality. Proponents have reported the validity and reliability of citation counts in research assessments as well as the positive correlation between these counts and peer reviews/assessments of publication venues (Aksnes & Taxt, 2004; Glänzel, 1996; Kostoff, 1996; Martin, 1996; Narin, 1976; So, 1998; van Raan, 2000). Critics, on the other hand, claim that citation counting has serious problems or limitations that affect its validity (MacRoberts & MacRoberts, 1996; Seglen, 1998). Important limitations reported in the literature focus on, among other things, the problems associated with the data sources used, especially the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, currently Thomson Scientific) citation databases: Arts & Humanities Citation Index, Science Citation Index, and Social Sciences Citation Index—the standard and most widely used tools for generating citation data for research and other assessment purposes. These tools are now currently part of what is known as Web of Science (WoS), the portal used to search the three ISI citation databases. In this paper, we use ISI citation databases and WoS interchangeably. Critics of ISI citation databases note that they: (1) cover mainly North American, Western European, and English-language titles; (2) are limited to citations from 8,700 journals; (3) do not count citations from books and most conference proceedings; (4) provide different coverage between research fields; and (5) have citing errors, such as homonyms, synonyms, and inconsistency in the use of initials and in the spelling of non-English names (many of these errors, however, come from the primary documents themselves rather than being the result of faulty ISI indexing). Studies that have addressed problems of, and/or suggested alternative or complementary sources to, ISI citation databases are very few and can be divided into two main groups: Studies that examined the effect of certain limitations in ISI database, most often comparing its coverage with that of other citation sources; and Studies that suggested or explored different or additional sources and methods for identifying citations. Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory lists approximately 22,500 active academic/scholarly, refereed journals. Of these, approximately 7,500 are published in the United States, 4,150 in the United Kingdom, 1,600 in the Netherlands, 1,370 in Germany, 660 in Australia, 540 in Japan, and 500 in Canada, 450 in China, 440 in India, and 420 in France. 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2024

[67] RecSOI: recommending research directions using statements of ignorance Adrien Bibal, ..., and Lawrence E. Hunter Journal of Biomedical Semantics 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2024

[68] Requirements for a Digital Library System: A Case Study in Digital Humanities (Technical Report) Hermann Kroll, ..., and Thomas Risse Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

5.2

2024

[69] Interesting Scientific Idea Generation Using Knowledge Graphs and LLMs: Evaluations with 100 Research Group Leaders Xuemei Gu and Mario Krenn Journal Not Provided 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2024

[70] Harvesting Textual and Structured Data from the HAL Publication Repository Francis Kulumba, ..., and Laurent Romary ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

25.4

2020

[71] Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata Ginny Hendricks, ..., and P. Feeney Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 125 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

125.3

2018

[72] The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles Heather A. Piwowar, ..., and S. Haustein PeerJ 2018 - 859 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.8

2023

[73] Study on the Characteristics of Cross‐Domain Knowledge Diffusion from Science to Policy: Evidence from Overton Data Chao Ren and Menghui Yang Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

1.0

2023

[74] Rethinking Hybrid Open Access Labels for Post-Embargo Articles Eric Schares OpenISU 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

1.5

2023

[75] CRUISE-Screening: Living Literature Reviews Toolbox Wojciech Kusa, ..., and A. Hanbury Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2023 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

4.8

2018

[76] How Unpaywall is transforming open science Holly Else Nature 2018 - 31 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2024

[77] Employment and mental health in the working age population: a protocol for a systematic review of longitudinal studies Fiona Aanesen, ..., and Lars-Kristian Lunde Systematic Reviews 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

1.3

2024

[78] AI on AI: Exploring the Utility of GPT as an Expert Annotator of AI Publications Autumn Toney-Wails, ..., and James Dunham ArXiv 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

4.6

2013

[79] Dealing with metadata quality: The legacy of digital library efforts A. Tani, ..., and D. Castelli Inf. Process. Manag. 2013 - 51 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

4.2

2024

[80] The open access coverage of OpenAlex, Scopus and Web of Science Marc-André Simard, ..., and Philippe Mongeon ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.8

2023

[81] FAIRSECO: An Extensible Framework for Impact Measurement of Research Software Deekshitha, ..., and S. Jansen 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science) 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

185.4

2018

[82] Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories Alberto Martín-Martín, ..., and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar J. Informetrics 2018 - 1178 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[83] Quantifying the hierarchical scales of scientists'mobility Yurui Huang, ..., and Yifang Ma ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

24.8

2018

[84] Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries Emanuel Kulczycki, ..., and Alesia A. Zuccala Scientometrics 2018 - 167 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

19.7

2024

[85] The landscape of biomedical research Rita González-Márquez, ..., and D. Kobak Patterns 2024 - 16 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

7.4

2024

[86] An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases Dušan Nikolić, ..., and Lidija Ivanović Scientometrics 2024 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2023

[87] Article Classification with Graph Neural Networks and Multigraphs Khang Ly, ..., and Valeria Krzhizhanovskaya International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

13.4

2017

[88] The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university Sven E. Hug and M. Brändle Scientometrics 2017 - 104 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[89] The overlooked need for Ethics in Complexity Science: Why it matters Olumide Adisa, ..., and Ana Maria de Sousa Leitao ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

1.2

2024

[90] Citation Amnesia: NLP and Other Academic Fields Are in a Citation Age Recession Jan Philip Wahle, ..., and Saif Mohammad ArXiv 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

2.6

2023

[91] Why are these publications missing? Uncovering the reasons behind the exclusion of documents in free‐access scholarly databases Lorena Delgado-Quirós, ..., and José Luis Ortega Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2023 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[92] Geographical and Disciplinary Coverage of Open Access Journals: OpenAlex, Scopus and WoS Abdelghani Maddi, ..., and Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

24.5

2023

[93] The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges Leigh-Ann Butler, ..., and Stefanie Haustein Quantitative Science Studies 2023 - 28 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[94] Acceso abierto en Argentina: una propuesta para el monitoreo de las publicaciones científicas con OpenAlex Carolina Unzurrunzaga, ..., and Juan Pablo Alperin ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: This study proposes a methodology using OpenAlex (OA) for tracking Open Access publications in the case of Argentina, a country where a self-archiving mandate has been in effect since 2013 ( Law 26.899, 2013). A sample of 167,240 papers by researchers from the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET) was created and analyzed using statistical techniques. We estimate that OA is able to capture between 85-93% of authors for all disciplines, with the exception of Social Sciences and Humanities, where it only reaches an estimated 47%. The availability of papers in Open Access was calculated to be 41% for the period 1953-2021 and 46% when considering exclusively the post-law period (2014-2021). In both periods, gold Open Access made up the most common route. When comparing equal periods post and pre-law, we observed that the upward trend of gold Open Access was pre-existing to the legislation and the availability of closed articles in repositories increased by 5% to what is estimated based on existing trends. However, while the green route has had a positive evolution, it has been the publication in gold journals that has boosted access to Argentine production more rapidly. We concluded that the OA-based methodology, piloted here for the first time, is viable for tracking Open Access in Argentina since it yields percentages similar to other national and international studies. En este estudio se propone una metodolog\'ia utilizando OpenAlex (OA) para monitorear el acceso abierto (AA) a las publicaciones cient\'ificas para el caso de Argentina, pa\'is donde rige el mandato de autoarchivo -Ley 26.899 (2013)-. Se conform\'o una muestra con 167.240 art\'iculos de investigadores del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient\'ificas y T\'ecnicas (CONICET) que se analizaron con t\'ecnicas estad\'isticas. Se estim\'o que OA puede representar entre 85-93% de los autores para todas las disciplinas, excepto Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, donde solo alcanza al 47%. Se calcul\'o que 41% de los art\'iculos publicados entre 1953-2021 incluidos en la fuente est\'an en AA, porcentaje que sube a 46% al considerar exclusivamente el periodo post ley (2014-2021). En ambos periodos es la v\'ia dorada la que representa mayor proporci\'on. Al comparar periodos iguales post y pre ley, se observ\'o que la tendencia en alza de la v\'ia dorada era preexistente a la legislaci\'on y la disponibilidad de art\'iculos cerrados en repositorios aument\'o un 5% a lo que se estima en base a tendencias existentes. Se concluye que si bien la v\'ia verde ha tenido una evoluci\'on positiva, ha sido la publicaci\'on en revistas doradas lo que ha impulsado m\'as r\'apidamente el acceso a la producci\'on argentina. Asimismo, que la metodolog\'ia basada en OA, piloteada aqu\'i por primera vez, es viable para monitorear el AA en Argentina ya que arroja porcentajes similares a otros estudios nacionales e internacionales. 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[95] Surprising Resilience of Science During a Global Pandemic: A Large-Scale Descriptive Analysis Kian Ahrabian, ..., and Kristina Lerman ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[96] Who2chat: A Social Networking System for Academic Researchers in Virtual Social Hours Enabling Coordinating, Overcoming Barriers and Social Signaling Soya Park, ..., and Thomas W. Malone Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.4

2008

[97] WOS vs. Scopus: On the reliability of scientometrics V. Larivière Journal Not Provided 2008 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

2.0

2019

[98] The Lens MetaRecord and LensID: An open identifier system for aggregated metadata and versioning of knowledge artefacts O. Jefferson, ..., and Richard A Jefferson https://doi.org/10.31229/osf.io/t56yh 2019 - 10 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

31.0

2018

[99] Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation Daniel W. Hook, ..., and C. Herzog Frontiers Res. Metrics Anal. 2018 - 196 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

None

[100] in 26 Billion RDF Triples Michael Färber, ..., and Peter Haase Journal Not Provided None - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.8

2024

[101] Acceso abierto en Argentina. Una propuesta para el monitoreo de las publicaciones científicas con OpenAlex Carolina Unzurrunzaga, ..., and Juan Pablo Alperin Información, cultura y sociedad 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2023

[102] OpenAlex: breve guía de consulta a través de R Ángel Borrego Infonomy 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

1.8

2022

[103] The availability and completeness of open funder metadata: Case study for publications funded by the Dutch Research Council Bianca Kramer and H. D. Jonge Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

2.1

2024

[104] Acceptability, values, and preferences of older people for chronic low back pain management; a qualitative evidence synthesis H. Ames, ..., and Andrew M. Briggs BMC Geriatrics 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[105] Recent Publication Trends of Systems Engineers: Journals, Topics, and the Impact of Open Access J. Caddell and Roshi Rose Nilchiani 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE) 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

3.0

2022

[106] La batalla de las lenguas en la publicación nacional: un estudio comparativo de las publicaciones del CNPq (Brasil) y Conicet (Argentina) Fernanda Beigel and L. Digiampietri Tempo Social 2022 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.4

2021

[107] Entwicklung und Typologie des Datendiensts Unpaywall Najko Jahn, ..., and Nick Haupka Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 2021 - 5 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

2.5

2019

[108] Le français, langue seconde ? De l'évolution des lieux et langues de publication des chercheurs au Québec, en France et en Allemagne Vincent Larivière Recherche 2019 - 14 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

3.5

2024

[109] Forecasting high-impact research topics via machine learning on evolving knowledge graphs Xuemei Gu and Mario Krenn ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

9.7

2016

[110] Microsoft Academic: is the phoenix getting wings? Anne-Wil Harzing and Satu Alakangas Scientometrics 2016 - 78 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2024

[111] Audiovisual Resources Metadata: Analysis of Records Originating From Novice Metadata Creators in Kuwait Saleh H. Aljalahmah and Oksana L. Zavalina Journal of Library Metadata 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

2.7

2024

[112] Academic collaboration on large language model studies increases overall but varies across disciplines Lingyao Li, ..., and Libby Hemphill ArXiv 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

4.6

2024

[113] DNA and RNA vaccines against tuberculosis: a scoping review of human and animal studies Alisa Kazakova, ..., and Albert Muslimov Frontiers in Immunology 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: Introduction To comprehensively identify and provide an overview of in vivo or clinical studies of nucleic acids (NA)-based vaccines against TB we included human or animal studies of NA vaccines for the prevention or treatment of TB and excluded in vitro or in silico research, studies of microorganisms other than M. tuberculosis, reviews, letters, and low-yield reports. Methods We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, selected Web of Science and ProQuest databases, Google Scholar, eLIBRARY.RU, PROSPERO, OSF Registries, Cochrane CENTRAL, EU Clinical Trials Register, clinicaltrials.gov, and others through WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal, AVMA and CABI databases, bioRxiv, medRxiv, and others through OSF Preprint Archive Search. We searched the same sources and Google for vaccine names (GX-70) and scanned reviews for references. Data on antigenic composition, delivery systems, adjuvants, and vaccine efficacy were charted and summarized descriptively. Results A total of 18,157 records were identified, of which 968 were assessed for eligibility. No clinical studies were identified. 365 reports of 345 animal studies were included in the review. 342 (99.1%) studies involved DNA vaccines, and the remaining three focused on mRNA vaccines. 285 (82.6%) studies used single-antigen vaccines, while 48 (13.9%) used multiple antigens or combinations with adjuvants. Only 12 (3.5%) studies involved multiepitope vaccines. The most frequently used antigens were immunodominant secretory antigens (Ag85A, Ag85B, ESAT6), heat shock proteins, and cell wall proteins. Most studies delivered naked plasmid DNA intramuscularly without additional adjuvants. Only 4 of 17 studies comparing NA vaccines to BCG after M. tuberculosis challenge demonstrated superior protection in terms of bacterial load reduction. Some vaccine variants showed better efficacy compared to BCG. Systematic review registration https://osf.io/, identifier F7P9G. 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.2

2020

[114] Open Abstracts: Where are we? L. Waltman https://doi.org/10.5555/6VS5EN6 2020 - 5 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2024

[115] Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis M. Sharp, ..., and Barbara Clyne HRB Open Research 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: Background Scientific publications have been growing exponentially, contributing to an oversaturated information environment. Quantifying a research output’s impact and reach cannot be solely measured by traditional metrics like citation counts as these have a lag time and are largely focused on an academic audience. There is increasing recognition to consider ‘alternative metrics’ or altmetrics to measure more immediate and broader impacts of research. Better understanding of altmetrics can help researchers better navigate evolving information environments and changing appetites for different types of research. Objectives Our study aims to: 1) analyse the amount and medium of Altmetric coverage of health research produced by Irish organisations (2017 – 2023), identifying changes over time and 2) investigate differences in the amount of coverage between clinical areas (e.g., nutrition vs. neurology). Methods Using Altmetric institutional access, we will gather data on research outputs published 1 January 2017 through 31 December 2023 from active Irish organisations with Research Organisation Registry (ROR) IDs. Outputs will be deduplicated and stratified by their Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification relating to ≥1 field of health research: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Health Sciences, and Psychology. We will clean data using R and perform descriptive analyses, establishing counts and frequencies of coverage by clinical area and medium (e.g., traditional news, X, etc.); data will be plotted on a yearly and quarterly basis where appropriate. Results and Conclusions Improved understanding of one’s information environment can help researchers better navigate their local landscapes and identify pathways for more effective communication to the public. All R code will be made available open-source, allowing researchers to adapt it to evaluate their local landscapes. 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.8

2023

[116] Overdosevarslingssystemer – en kartleggingsoversikt med maskinlæring Tiril C. Borge and Ashley E. Muller Nordisk Alkohol- & Narkotikatidskrift : NAT 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Sammendrag Bakgrunn: Helsedirektoratet ønsker å vurdere muligheten for å etablere et nasjonalt overdosevarslingssystem (OVS) for å kunne varsle brukere om økt overdosefare. OVS som system forstås her som et sett med sammenhengende elementer som fungerer som en helhet, der hensikten er tidlig oppdagelse av økt overdoserisiko kombinert med rask varsling til de som står i fare for overdoser. Metode: Vi utførte en kartleggingsoversikt over forskning om varslingssystemer for økt overdosefare. Mål 1 var å kartlegge eksisterende forskning om effekten av et OVS (antall brukere nådd, antall overdoser, varslingshurtighet). Mål 2 var å kartlegge eksisterende forskning som kunne belyse brukeres erfaringer med slike systemer. Resultater: Vi brukte flere maskinlæringsfunksjoner for å identifisere og vurdere totalt 4102 referanser fra litteratursøk gjennomført i mars/april 2022, hvorav 11 studier oppfylte inklusjonskriteriene. Effekt av OVS på antall overdoser var ikke mulig å skille fra eksisterende overdoseforebyggende tiltak. OVS’er varslet skadereduksjonsgrupper eller erfaringskonsulenter så tidlig som fire timer etter innmeldt/oppdaget fare. Antall brukere varslet ble i stor grad ikke rapportert, antageligvis fordi data om dette ikke ble innsamlet. Fra syv kvalitative studier ble mønstre i hovedfunn sett på tvers, som omhandlet preferanser for språkbruk og innhold, hvor varslinger burde komme fra, og prinsippene bak dem. Konklusjon: Vi identifiserte lite empirisk forskning om eksisterende OVS’er, særlig relatert til effekt av slike systemer. Uten tilstrekkelig forskningsgrunnlag om effekt må vi være forsiktige med å trekke konklusjoner om hvilke typer OVS’er som bør og ikke bør innføres i Norge. Opprettelse av et OVS trenger ikke nødvendigvis innebære etablering av en ny infrastruktur, men heller være snakk om at to godt utviklede, eksisterende systemer – systemer for overvåking og skadereduksjonstiltak – kan kobles sammen. 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[117] Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023 Stefanie Haustein, ..., and Nina Schönfelder ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2023

[118] PreprintResolver: Improving Citation Quality by Resolving Published Versions of ArXiv Preprints using Literature Databases Louise Bloch, ..., and C. Friedrich International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

None

[119] Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation H. Moed https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3714-7 None - 1365 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

5.0

2024

[120] Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information A. Editorial Science Editor and Publisher 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.8

2023

[121] What is Convergence?: A Systematic Review of the Definition of and Aspects of Convergent Work Michael S. Thompson, ..., and Philip Asare 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: Wicked problems, the National Academy of Engineering's Grand Challenges, the United Nations' Sustainability Goals, and similar complex, global-scale endeavors fall under the broad umbrella of “convergent” work. Over the past two decades there has been an increase in interest and funding for work in this space. The NSF has two programs focused in this area, Growing Convergence Research and the Convergence Accelerator. Boston University's College of Engineering recently announced a focus on convergent projects and work. The National Academic of Engineering also has the Grand Challenge Scholars program with over 100 participating schools. The list continues to grow. The broad concept of convergence seems to be quite simple: combine the ideas, skills, and/or methods of multiple disciplines to create something new. More specific definitions vary and while the interest in convergence and convergent problems continues to increase, there is no easily operational definition of convergence. This is especially true with respect to undergraduate-level education where students have limited experience and knowledge to carry out such efforts. To better understand the variation that exists within the literature on convergence we conducted a systematic review to explore how convergence is defined in scholarly literature. We have identified a small number of categories within the definition space and conducted a thematic analysis of the aspects of each. The results show that there is a fairly consistent focus on the work being socially-relevant and on creating something new such as an idea, method, product, or process to address desired needs. Additionally, doing convergent work requires the integration of aspects of multiple disciplines and is conducted by diverse teams. Lastly, the disciplinary backgrounds of those teams almost always includes the natural and biological sciences with a subset the following disciplines: information or computing sciences, engineering, social sciences, and humanities. While there is some consistency in the definition, there also seems to be space for some variation which leaves for some level of choice in the definition. 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2023

[122] Dataset for the analysis of gendered research productivity affected by early COVID-19 pandemic Eunrang Kwon, ..., and Jeong-han Kang Data in Brief 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

56.2

2024

[123] A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour Melissa Bond, ..., and G. Siemens International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 2024 - 52 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

1.4

2024

[124] The increasing fragmentation of global science limits the diffusion of ideas Alexander J. Gates, ..., and Jianjian Gao ArXiv 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.7

2023

[125] Connecting with Future Talent: A Review of Employer Value Propositions and Digital Media Channels for Sustainable Companies Targeting Generations Y and Z J. Teori, ..., and Kristia Jurnal Manajemen Teori dan Terapan | Journal of Theory and Applied Management 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Objective: This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the employer value proposition of ethical and sustainable companies and the effective digital media channels that sustainable companies can use to attract and communicate with Generation Y and Z candidates. Design/Methods/Approach: The PRISMA systematic literature review method was combined with content analysis of selected articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The selected articles were limited to those published within the last six years and in English. Findings: This study found that sustainable companies need to offer a corporate value proposition that prioritizes clear career progression, work-life balance, a supportive work atmosphere, and ethical aspects, such as reducing carbon footprint and promoting diversity and inclusion. These values are essential to Generations Y and Z, although the priority dimensions of their value propositions may differ. Companies utilize Digital media channels, including owned digital media, paid digital media by using paid endorsers or enhanced profiles on career websites, and earned digital media such as honest reviews on job board platforms and private social media from employees. Originality/Value: This review adds to the existing literature by comprehensively discussing the combined issues of employer value proposition, generational differences, and sustainability. Practical/Policy implication: This review's findings have implications for business and research practice, as sustainable companies can use this information to develop the most relevant corporate value propositions and communication strategies for future targeted talent. Companies can attract and retain top personnel and establish a positive employer brand by effectively communicating their sustainability practices and values. Additional empirical research could investigate the impact of other demographic and psychographic factors on the preferences and priorities of job seekers. 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[126] The Most Cited Scientific Information Sources in Wikipedia Articles Across Various Languages Włodzimierz Lewoniewski Biblioteka 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

12.9

2023

[127] New trends in bibliometric APIs: A comparative analysis A. Velez-Estevez, ..., and M. Cobo Inf. Process. Manag. 2023 - 19 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

6.7

2016

[128] An Analysis of the Microsoft Academic Graph Drahomira Herrmannova and Petr Knoth D Lib Mag. 2016 - 56 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.4

2024

[129] Biomedical Open Source Software: Crucial Packages and Hidden Heroes Andrew Nesbitt, ..., and Stephan Druskat ArXiv 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

12.1

2004

[130] The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting Thomas R. Bruce and Diane Hillmann Journal Not Provided 2004 - 254 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2024

[131] The association between benzodiazepine co-prescription, opioid agonist treatment and mortality: a systematic review C. H. Hestevik, ..., and Ivar Skeie BMC Psychiatry 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

16.2

2015

[132] Scientific Babel: How Science Was Done Before and After Global English M. Gordin https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.193754 2015 - 157 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2023

[133] Finding Potential Research Collaborations from Social Networks Derived from Topic Models Md Asaduzzaman Noor, ..., and Jason A. Clark 2023 10th International Conference on Behavioural and Social Computing (BESC) 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2024

[134] A persistent gender pay gap among faculty in a public university system Lanu Kim, ..., and Sebastian Munoz-Najar Galvez Scientific Reports 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

19.9

2012

[135] ORCID: a system to uniquely identify researchers Laurel L. Haak, ..., and Howard Ratner Learned Publishing 2012 - 243 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2024

[136] SciConNav: Knowledge navigation through contextual learning of extensive scientific research trajectories Shibing Xiang, ..., and Yifang Ma Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.0

2024

[137] Open-Source Software, Fediverse and Custom ROMs as Tools for a Sustainable Internet Stefan Rödiger, ..., and Mario Birkholz 2024 Electronics Goes Green 2024+ (EGG) 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.3

2021

[138] Can we assess research using open scientific knowledge graphs? A case study within the Italian National Scientific Qualification Federica Bologna, ..., and Francesco Poggi ArXiv 2021 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

12.2

2019

[139] Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics A. Raan https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_10 2019 - 73 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

2.8

2016

[140] Comparison of Microsoft Academic (Graph) with Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar Bartosz Paszcza Journal Not Provided 2016 - 23 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

Research topic

Report

References

Select the format you want to download:

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS