Undermind Research Topic: I want to find empirical research papers comparing the metadata completeness and accuracy of OpenAlex with Scopus or Web of Science, specifically focusing on their effectiveness for citation searching.

Research topic

I want to find empirical research papers comparing the metadata completeness and accuracy of OpenAlex with Scopus or Web of Science, specifically focusing on their effectiveness for citation searching.

Report

OpenAlex generally offers broader coverage but varies in metadata completeness and accuracy compared to Scopus and Web of Science, with implications for citation searching outlined primarily in studies [1] and [2].

Metadata Completeness and Accuracy: OpenAlex captures more diverse sources, including preprints, and excels in fields like ORCID identifiers but has lower abstract completeness than Scopus and Web of Science. It shows strengths in broader overall coverage and inclusivity, particularly for Global South publications, yet struggles with aspects like affiliation and funding data [1][2][4].
Citation Searching Effectiveness: Discrepancies in citation counts and coverage exist, impacting OpenAlex's effectiveness compared to Scopus. While there is high agreement in rank correlations for citation coverage at the country level, issues like language identification and zero-indexed references highlight areas needing improvement [2].
Field-normalized Citation Scores: OpenAlex exhibits comparable field-normalized citation scores to Scopus and Web of Science, suggesting its potential for bibliometric evaluations despite some metadata drawbacks [5].
Challenges and Recommendations: OpenAlex needs enhancements in metadata completeness, particularly in references and affiliations, and better author disambiguation to match the quality of commercial databases fully [1][2][4]. Overall, while promising, OpenAlex requires these improvements to become a more effective tool for citation searching in complex bibliometric analyses.

Empirical Comparisons of Metadata Completeness and Accuracy

These papers conduct empirical comparisons of metadata completeness and accuracy between OpenAlex and proprietary databases like Scopus and Web of Science.
References: [1, 2, 4]
Details:
- [1] Examines reference coverage and metadata fields, comparing ORCID identifiers and abstracts among OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS.
- [2] Compares metadata completeness, citation coverage per country, and document type differences between OpenAlex and Scopus.
- [4] Analyzes coverage and metadata availability for African publications in OpenAlex compared to Scopus and WoS.

Relevance to Citation Searching

These studies focus on aspects relevant to citation searching, including citation coverage analysis and implications for bibliometric research.
References: [2, 5]
Details:
- [2] Analyzes citation coverage discrepancies and metadata issues that impact citation searching.
- [5] Provides empirical data comparing OpenAlex's field-normalized scores with Scopus and WoS, relevant for evaluating citation searching.

Discussion of Metadata Fields and Challenges

Papers in this category discuss specific metadata fields and challenges related to OpenAlex when compared to other databases.
References: [1, 4]
Details:
- [1] Highlights discrepancies in reference counts and author disambiguation in OpenAlex versus Scopus and WoS.
- [4] Notes limitations in metadata concerning affiliations, references, and funder information in OpenAlex.

Broader Contextual Analyses

These papers situate OpenAlex within a broader analysis of multiple bibliometric databases, although not focusing solely on empirical comparisons with Scopus or WoS.
References: [3, 6, 9]
Details:
- [3] Evaluates backward and forward citation coverage across 59 databases, including OpenAlex.
- [6] Compares geographical and disciplinary coverage of OA journals in OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS.
- [9] Analyzes metadata completeness in various free-access databases like OpenAlex, without including Scopus or WoS.

Historical and Conceptual Overviews

Papers that orient OpenAlex within the historical and conceptual development of bibliometric databases.
References: [7, 10]
Details:
- [7] Analyzes errors in Scopus and WoS without mentioning OpenAlex, provides insights into traditional database challenges.
- [10] Compares OpenAlex with Microsoft Academic Graph, focusing on metadata changes during the transition, but does not include Scopus or WoS.

These categories encapsulate the critical aspects related to metadata completeness and accuracy comparisons specifically between OpenAlex, Scopus, and Web of Science, with a particular focus on elements relevant for citation searching.

References

Last 5 years

Last 2 years

> 1 citation per year

> 5 citations per year

Topic Match

Cit./Year

Year

Paper

Paper Relevance Summary

99.7%

11.1

2024

[1] Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus Jack H. Culbert, ..., and Philipp Mayr ArXiv 2024 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 99.7% topic match

Provides an empirical comparison of OpenAlex, Web of Science, and Scopus. Analyzes metadata completeness and accuracy across these databases with mixed results, noting issues with author disambiguation in OpenAlex. While relevant to completeness and accuracy, it lacks a direct focus on citation searching effectiveness. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

98.7%

12.2

2024

[2] An analysis of the suitability of OpenAlex for bibliometric analyses J. Alperin, ..., and S. Haustein ArXiv 2024 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 98.7% topic match

Provides an empirical comparison of OpenAlex with Scopus. Examines metadata completeness and accuracy, highlighting discrepancies affecting citation searching capabilities. Does not include a comparison with Web of Science. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

88.7%

6.8

2024

[3] Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices. Michael Gusenbauer Research synthesis methods 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite 88.7% topic match

Provides empirical evaluation of citation coverage across 59 citation indices. Analyzes backward and forward citation links, including OpenAlex, Scopus, and Web of Science. Does not specifically focus on metadata completeness and accuracy of these databases.

83.9%

0.0

2024

[4] Coverage and metadata availability of African publications in OpenAlex: A comparative analysis Patricia Alonso-Alvarez and Nees Jan van Eck ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 83.9% topic match

Provides an empirical analysis of metadata completeness in databases. Compares metadata availability for African publications in OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS, highlighting strengths and weaknesses. Focuses on metadata rather than citation searching capabilities, relevant but not precisely on target. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

51.3%

0.7

2023

[5] How similar are field-normalized scores from different free or commercial databases calculated for large German universities? T. Scheidsteger, ..., and L. Bornmann 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023) 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 51.3% topic match

Provides an empirical comparison of field-normalized citation scores. Compares scores from OpenAlex with Web of Science and Scopus for German universities' publications. Focuses on citation scores, not directly on metadata completeness or accuracy. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

23.1%

0.0

2024

[6] Geographical and Disciplinary Coverage of Open Access Journals: OpenAlex, Scopus and WoS Abdelghani Maddi, ..., and Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 23.1% topic match

Examines geographical and disciplinary coverage of OA journals. Focuses on inclusivity and biases in OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS. Lacks empirical comparisons of metadata accuracy for citation searching. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

19.3%

19.9

2016

[7] Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science F. Franceschini, ..., and L. Mastrogiacomo J. Informetrics 2016 - 160 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 19.3% topic match

Provides an empirical analysis of errors in Scopus and WoS. Compares data accuracy and completeness, finding Scopus may be more accurate but omits more papers. Does not mention OpenAlex or address citation searching effectiveness, limiting relevance. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

17.8%

9.5

2024

[8] Analysis of the Publication and Document Types in OpenAlex, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed and Semantic Scholar Nick Haupka, ..., and Philipp Mayr ArXiv 2024 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 17.8% topic match

Examines publication types across OpenAlex, Scopus, and others. Focuses on coverage and classification, not metadata completeness or accuracy. Lacks empirical comparison for citation searching effectiveness among the databases. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

5.5%

8.9

2024

[9] Completeness degree of publication metadata in eight free-access scholarly databases Lorena Delgado-Quirós and José Luis Ortega Quantitative Science Studies 2024 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 5.5% topic match

Provides a comparative analysis of metadata completeness in scholarly databases. Analyzes OpenAlex but not Scopus or Web of Science, focusing on field completeness. Does not include empirical comparisons with Scopus or Web of Science, nor focus on citation searching. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

4.9%

4.6

2022

[10] Comparison of metadata with relevance for bibliometrics between Microsoft Academic Graph and OpenAlex until 2020 T. Scheidsteger and R. Haunschild ArXiv 2022 - 11 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 4.9% topic match

Compares metadata between Microsoft Academic Graph and OpenAlex. Evaluates metadata preservation and changes during MAG to OpenAlex transition. Does not compare OpenAlex with Scopus or Web of Science. ✅ Show detailed summary of full text

4.7%

8.4

2023

[11] How are exclusively data journals indexed in major scholarly databases? An examination of four databases Chenyue Jiao, ..., and Zhichao Fang Scientific Data 2023 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 4.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

4.2%

None

[12] Quantitative comparison of publication metadata in eight free-access databases Lorena Delgado-Quirós and José Luis Ortega Journal Not Provided None - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 4.2% topic match

3.7%

0.0

2023

[13] Comparing bibliographic descriptions in seven free-access databases Lorena Joaquina Delgado Quirós and J. Ortega 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023) 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 3.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

3.1%

11.1

2024

[14] Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Luc'ia C'espedes, ..., and Vincent Larivière ArXiv 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 3.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.6%

11.7

2019

[15] Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus Nees Jan van Eck and L. Waltman ArXiv 2019 - 64 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.1%

0.0

2024

[16] Anatomy of the top 1% most highly cited publications: An empirical comparison of two approaches Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez, ..., and Carlos Olmeda-Gómez Quantitative Science Studies 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.1%

8.8

2006

[17] A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar Lokman I. Meho and Kiduk Yang ArXiv 2006 - 157 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.0%

285.4

2015

[18] The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis P. Mongeon and Adèle Paul-Hus Scientometrics 2015 - 2595 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

2.0%

1.8

2023

[19] Global flows and rates of international migration of scholars Aliakbar Akbaritabar, ..., and E. Zagheni https://doi.org/10.4054/mpidr-wp-2023-018 2023 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 2.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.9%

187.4

2018

[20] Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories Alberto Martín-Martín, ..., and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar J. Informetrics 2018 - 1175 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.6%

0.2

2011

[21] Multi-faceted Citation Analysis for Quality Assessment of Scholarly Publications Kiduk Yang and Lokman I. Meho Journal of The Korean Society for Information Management 2011 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite 1.6% topic match

1.5%

127.5

2020

[22] Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations Alberto Mart'in-Mart'in, ..., and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar Scientometrics 2020 - 582 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.3%

8.8

2024

[23] An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases Dušan Nikolić, ..., and Lidija Ivanović Scientometrics 2024 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite 1.3% topic match

1.3%

15.5

2020

[24] Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge Jonathan P. Tennant European Science Editing 2020 - 73 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.2%

0.0

2023

[25] Web of Science Citation Gaps: An Automatic Approach to Detect Indexed but Missing Citations David Rodrigues, ..., and Fernando Batista Slate 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 1.2% topic match

1.2%

1.8

2022

[26] The availability and completeness of open funder metadata: Case study for publications funded by the Dutch Research Council Bianca Kramer and H. D. Jonge Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.2%

4.7

2024

[27] The open access coverage of OpenAlex, Scopus and Web of Science Marc-André Simard, ..., and Philippe Mongeon ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.1%

66.2

2022

[28] OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts Jason Priem, ..., and Richard Orr ArXiv 2022 - 169 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

1.0%

2.2

2014

[29] Matching Medline/PubMed data with Web of Science: A routine in R language D. Rotolo and L. Leydesdorff Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2014 - 23 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 1.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.9%

4.7

2015

[30] Evaluation of the citation matching algorithms of CWTS and iFQ in comparison to the Web of science Marlies Olensky, ..., and Nees Jan van Eck Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2015 - 44 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.9%

1.6

2024

[31] The increasing fragmentation of global science limits the diffusion of ideas Alexander J. Gates, ..., and Jianjian Gao ArXiv 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.9%

13.6

2023

[32] New trends in bibliometric APIs: A comparative analysis A. Velez-Estevez, ..., and M. Cobo Inf. Process. Manag. 2023 - 19 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.9% topic match

0.9%

0.0

2024

[33] Acceso abierto en Argentina: una propuesta para el monitoreo de las publicaciones científicas con OpenAlex Carolina Unzurrunzaga, ..., and Juan Pablo Alperin ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: This study proposes a methodology using OpenAlex (OA) for tracking Open Access publications in the case of Argentina, a country where a self-archiving mandate has been in effect since 2013 ( Law 26.899, 2013). A sample of 167,240 papers by researchers from the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET) was created and analyzed using statistical techniques. We estimate that OA is able to capture between 85-93% of authors for all disciplines, with the exception of Social Sciences and Humanities, where it only reaches an estimated 47%. The availability of papers in Open Access was calculated to be 41% for the period 1953-2021 and 46% when considering exclusively the post-law period (2014-2021). In both periods, gold Open Access made up the most common route. When comparing equal periods post and pre-law, we observed that the upward trend of gold Open Access was pre-existing to the legislation and the availability of closed articles in repositories increased by 5% to what is estimated based on existing trends. However, while the green route has had a positive evolution, it has been the publication in gold journals that has boosted access to Argentine production more rapidly. We concluded that the OA-based methodology, piloted here for the first time, is viable for tracking Open Access in Argentina since it yields percentages similar to other national and international studies. En este estudio se propone una metodolog\'ia utilizando OpenAlex (OA) para monitorear el acceso abierto (AA) a las publicaciones cient\'ificas para el caso de Argentina, pa\'is donde rige el mandato de autoarchivo -Ley 26.899 (2013)-. Se conform\'o una muestra con 167.240 art\'iculos de investigadores del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient\'ificas y T\'ecnicas (CONICET) que se analizaron con t\'ecnicas estad\'isticas. Se estim\'o que OA puede representar entre 85-93% de los autores para todas las disciplinas, excepto Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, donde solo alcanza al 47%. Se calcul\'o que 41% de los art\'iculos publicados entre 1953-2021 incluidos en la fuente est\'an en AA, porcentaje que sube a 46% al considerar exclusivamente el periodo post ley (2014-2021). En ambos periodos es la v\'ia dorada la que representa mayor proporci\'on. Al comparar periodos iguales post y pre ley, se observ\'o que la tendencia en alza de la v\'ia dorada era preexistente a la legislaci\'on y la disponibilidad de art\'iculos cerrados en repositorios aument\'o un 5% a lo que se estima en base a tendencias existentes. Se concluye que si bien la v\'ia verde ha tenido una evoluci\'on positiva, ha sido la publicaci\'on en revistas doradas lo que ha impulsado m\'as r\'apidamente el acceso a la producci\'on argentina. Asimismo, que la metodolog\'ia basada en OA, piloteada aqu\'i por primera vez, es viable para monitorear el AA en Argentina ya que arroja porcentajes similares a otros estudios nacionales e internacionales. 0.9% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.8%

10.3

2023

[34] unarXive 2022: All arXiv Publications Pre-Processed for NLP, Including Structured Full-Text and Citation Network T. Saier, ..., and Michael Färber 2023 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) 2023 - 17 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.8% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.8%

77.8

2018

[35] Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases Michael Gusenbauer Scientometrics 2018 - 469 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.8% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.8%

4.7

2022

[36] Funding COVID-19 research: Insights from an exploratory analysis using open data infrastructures Alexis-Michel Mugabushaka, ..., and L. Waltman Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 13 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.8% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.7%

0.0

2024

[37] Recent Publication Trends of Systems Engineers: Journals, Topics, and the Impact of Open Access J. Caddell and Roshi Rose Nilchiani 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE) 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.7% topic match

0.7%

2.5

2024

[38] Using Scopus and OpenAlex APIs to retrieve bibliographic data for evidence synthesis. A procedure based on Bash and SQL Robin Harder MethodsX 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.7% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.6%

25.1

2018

[39] Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries Emanuel Kulczycki, ..., and Alesia A. Zuccala Scientometrics 2018 - 167 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.6%

0.7

2015

[40] Capturing Citation Activity in Three Health Sciences Departments: A Comparison Study of Scopus and Web of Science Alexandra Sarkozy, ..., and Wendy G. Wu Medical Reference Services Quarterly 2015 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.6% topic match

0.6%

0.0

2023

[41] Editorial: Linked open bibliographic data for real-time research assessment Mohamed Ben Aouicha, ..., and M. A. Hadj Taieb Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.6%

19.3

2022

[42] Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process S. Khanna, ..., and J. Willinsky Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 38 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.6% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

0.3

2022

[43] Which Publications' Metadata Are in Which Bibliographic Databases? A System for Exploration Michael Färber, ..., and Kristian Noullet Journal Not Provided 2022 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.5% topic match

0.5%

4.9

2024

[44] openalexR: An R-Tool for Collecting Bibliometric Data from OpenAlex Massimo Aria, ..., and June Choe R J. 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

1.3

2021

[45] Federating Scholarly Infrastructures with GraphQL Muhammad Haris, ..., and S. Auer ArXiv 2021 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

7.4

2024

[46] The oligopoly of academic publishers persists in exclusive database S. Bellen, ..., and Vincent Lariviere ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.5%

0.3

2021

[47] A Measure of Research Taste V. Koltun and David Hafner ArXiv 2021 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.5% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

19.9

2012

[48] ORCID: a system to uniquely identify researchers Laurel L. Haak, ..., and Howard Ratner Learned Publishing 2012 - 242 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

0.4%

None

[49] Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation H. Moed https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3714-7 None - 1364 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.4% topic match

0.4%

126.9

2018

[50] The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles Heather A. Piwowar, ..., and S. Haustein PeerJ 2018 - 859 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

0.5

2020

[51] Model Reuse in Machine Learning for Author Name Disambiguation: An Exploration of Transfer Learning Jinseok Kim and Jason Owen-Smith IEEE Access 2020 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.4% topic match

0.4%

0.7

2016

[52] Measuring Knowledge Translation Uptake Using Citation Metrics: A Case Study of a Pan-Canadian Network of Pharmacoepidemiology Researchers M. Rothfus, ..., and S. Stewart Science & Technology Libraries 2016 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

0.4%

36.5

2021

[53] UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science A. Nóvoa https://doi.org/10.54677/mnmh8546 2021 - 142 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

0.0

2024

[54] The rise of Indo-German collaborative research: 1990-2022 Aasif Ahmad Mir, ..., and Philipp Mayr ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Purpose This study aims to highlight the growth and development of Indo-German collaborative research over the past three decades. Moreover, this study encompasses an in-depth examination of funding acknowledgements to gain valuable insights into the financial support that underpins these collaborative endeavours. Together with this paper, the authors provide an openly accessible data set of Indo-German research papers for further and reproducible research activities (the “Indo-German Literature Dataset”). Design/methodology/approach The data were retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database from the year 1990 till the 30th of November 2022. A total of 36,999 records were retrieved against the used query. Acknowledged entities were extracted using a named entity recognition (NER) model specifically trained for this task. Interrelations between the extracted entities and scientific domains, lengths of acknowledgement texts, number of authors and affiliations, number of citations and gender of the first author, as well as collaboration patterns between Indian and German funders were examined. Findings The study reveals a consistent and increasing growth in the publication trend over the years. The study brings to light that Physics, Chemistry, Materials Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Engineering prominently dominate the Indo-German collaborative research. The USA, followed by England and France, are the most active collaborators in Indian and German research. Largely, research was funded by major German and Indian funding agencies, international corporations and German and American universities. Associations between the first author’s gender and acknowledged entity were observed. Additionally, relations between entity, entity type and scientific domain were discovered. Practical implications The study paves the way for enhanced collaboration, optimized resource utilization and societal advantages by offering a profound comprehension of the intricacies inherent in research partnerships between India and Germany. Implementation of the insights gleaned from this study holds the promise of cultivating a more resilient and influential collaborative research ecosystem between the two nations. Originality/value The study highlights a deeper understanding of the composition of the Indo-German collaborative research landscape of the past 30 years and its significance in advancing scientific knowledge and fostering international partnerships. Furthermore, the authors provide an open version of the original WoS data set. The Indo-German Literature Data set consists of 22,844 papers from OpenAlex and is available for related studies like literature studies and scientometrics. 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.4%

3.5

2021

[55] Measuring Research Information Citizenship Across ORCID Practice Simon Porter Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 2021 - 11 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.4% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

1.3

2021

[56] Designing a data infrastructure for catalysis science aligned to FAIR data principles Abraham Nieva de la Hidalga, ..., and C. Catlow Catalysis Communications 2021 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

4.7

2014

[57] Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases F. Franceschini, ..., and L. Mastrogiacomo Scientometrics 2014 - 47 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

188.0

2020

[58] The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis V. Singh, ..., and Philipp Mayr Scientometrics 2020 - 763 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

2.6

2020

[59] Creating RESTful APIs over SPARQL endpoints using RAMOSE Marilena Daquino, ..., and D. Shotton Semantic Web 2020 - 11 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

1.0

2021

[60] FONDUE: A Framework for Node Disambiguation and Deduplication Using Network Embeddings Ahmad Mel, ..., and Tijl De Bie Applied Sciences 2021 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

0.5

2023

[61] Report of the G7 Open Science - Research on Research Sub-Working Group Mathieu Régnier and Marin Dacos https://doi.org/10.52949/32 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

11.7

2016

[62] Citation analysis with microsoft academic Sven E. Hug, ..., and M. Brändle Scientometrics 2016 - 96 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

18.6

2023

[63] Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 S. Hajkowicz, ..., and Claire K. Naughtin ArXiv 2023 - 29 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.3%

146.4

2019

[64] Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses M. Linnenluecke, ..., and Abhay K. Singh Australian Journal of Management 2019 - 752 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

0.3%

11.5

2022

[65] The Cooperation Databank: Machine-Readable Science Accelerates Research Synthesis Giuliana Spadaro, ..., and D. Balliet Perspectives on Psychological Science 2022 - 29 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.3% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2024

[66] Why do some academic articles receive more citations from policy communities? Ji Ma and Y. Cheng Public Administration Review 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2024

[67] Is the scientific impact of the LIS themes gender-biased? A bibliometric analysis of the evolution, scientific impact, and relative contribution by gender from 2007 to 2022 Thamyres T. Choji, ..., and J. A. Moral-Munoz Scientometrics 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2024

[68] ORCID identifier adoption in Spanish scholarly communication: A macro and micro level perspective M. Bordons, ..., and B. González-Albo Learned Publishing 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

0.2%

0.0

2024

[69] Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023 Stefanie Haustein, ..., and Nina Schönfelder ArXiv 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.4

2022

[70] Local emergence, global expansion: understanding the structural evolution of a bi-lingual national research landscape M. Milia, ..., and R. Arvanitis Scientometrics 2022 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

6.7

2024

[71] Bibliometric Analysis of Model-Based Systems Engineering: Past, Current, and Future Zihang Li, ..., and Yan Yan IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2024 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

0.2%

0.0

2024

[72] Precisión de los perfiles de autor en portales institucionales de producción científica Inmaculada Bravo-García, ..., and Valeria Montoya-Roncancio Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

0.7

2023

[73] Measuring Data Re-Use Through Dataset Citations in OpenAlex Geoff Krause and P. Mongeon 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023) 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

20.1

2022

[74] Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research Lin Zhang, ..., and G. Sivertsen Scientometrics 2022 - 50 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2021

[75] Open Science for Veterinary Education Research Jill R D MacKay Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2021 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.3

2021

[76] Open bibliographic data and the Italian National Scientific Qualification: Measuring coverage of academic fields Federica Bologna, ..., and Francesco Poggi Quantitative Science Studies 2021 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

0.0

2024

[77] Bibliometric study of scientific production in music education from 2000 to 2022 Judith Sánchez-Marroquí and Gregorio Vicente-Nicolás International Journal of Music Education 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

0.6

2007

[78] [Statistical methods for comparison of two measuring procedures and for calibration: analysis of concordance, correlation and regression in the case of measuring intraocular pressure]. R. Koch and E. Spörl Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 2007 - 10 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.2%

7.2

2021

[79] Is preprint the future of science? A thirty year journey of online preprint services Boya Xie, ..., and Kuansan Wang ArXiv 2021 - 27 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.2% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.2%

32.8

2006

[80] How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. Julie May Glanville, ..., and J. Camosso-Stefinovic Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA 2006 - 612 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.2% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2024

[81] Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles and application of nanoadditives in diesel fuel: bibliometric analysis I. Morenko, ..., and Galina Ostaeva E3S Web of Conferences 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

1.7

2020

[82] Investigating Science Researchers’ Presence on Academic Profile Websites: A Case Study of a Canadian Research University Li Zhang and Chen Li Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 2020 - 7 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

None

[83] Analysing the Bibliometric of Circular Economy and Customer Behavior: A Study from 2018 to 2023 A. Menaga, ..., and S. Lokesh Journal Not Provided None - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

1.3

2005

[84] Welcome to the linguistic warp zone: Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities V. Larivière Journal Not Provided 2005 - 25 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: The goal of this paper is to examine the impact of linguistic coverage of databases used by bibliometricians on the capacity to effectively benchmark the work of social scientists and humanities researchers in various countries. The paper firstly examines the strong link between bibliometrics and the ISI's database and, subsequently, reviews the differences in the production and diffusion of knowledge in the SSH and NSE. This leads to an examination of the old debate on the coverage of ISI's databases, more specifically in the case of SSH. The methods section explain how we have compared the coverage of ISI's databases in the NSE and SSH to the Ulrich extensive database of journals. Our results show that there is a 20 to 25% overrepresentation of English-language journals in ISI's databases compared to the list of journals presented in Ulrich. This paper concludes that because of this bias, ISI's databases cannot be used to benchmark the output of countries in the SSH. Introduction Scientometric methods are increasingly used for science policy purposes, more particularly in Europe. The use of scientometrics for policy purposes has so far been mostly limited to the natural sciences and engineering (NSE), but this is changing and the extension of this evaluation process to the social sciences and humanities (SSH) may be a cause for concern. A number of scholars have highlighted fundamental differences between the scientific communication practices of scholars in the NSE and those in the SSH (Glänzel and Schoepflin, 1999; Hicks, 1999 and 2004; van Raan, 2003). For instance, SSH comprise a greater proportion of scientific publications which are not journal articles, and especially the proportion of books; referencing practices that translate in fewer citations towards relatively older literature; and the relatively more local orientation of research in the SSH. Indeed, while policy makers can count on scientometrics to produce relatively reliable and valuable results on the research performed in the NSE, their application to the SSH has been shown to be problematic for many reasons. A number of bibliographic characteristics proper to the SSH hampers scientometric analyses: research results are disseminated through a much broader range of media than in the NSE; referencing practices that translate in fewer citations towards relatively older literature; and the relatively more local orientation of research in the 1 This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. SSH. The problem posed by this last specificity is particularly important since efforts to solve it involve the changing of one of the central tools of scientometrics: the Thomson ISI Citation Indexes. Most bibliometric studies are based on one or more of the Thomson ISI databases: the Science Citation Index (SCI), the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), and the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI). The literature has argued the SSCI and the AHCI do not cover adequately journals and articles in languages other than English. In fact, there has been a healthy debate going on for years on this issue. Considering the potential expansion of scientometric evaluation for policy purposes to the SSH, this debate is highly relevant. The goal of this paper is to shed light on this debate and to examine the impact of linguistic coverage of the database on the capacity to effectively benchmark the work of social scientists and humanities researchers in various countries. The paper firstly examines the strong link between bibliometrics and the ISI's database and subsequently the differences between SSH and NSE. This reviews leads to examine the old debate on the coverage of ISI's databases, more specifically in the case of SSH. The methods section explain how we have compared the coverage of ISI's databases in the NSE and SSH to the Ulrich extensive database of journals. Our results show that there is a 20 to 25% overrepresentation of English-language journals in ISI's databases compared to the list of journals presented in Ulrich. This paper concludes that because of this bias, ISI's databases cannot be used to benchmark the output of countries in the SSH. The marriage of bibliometrics and ISI's databases Bibliometrics and scientometrics are a set of methods for measuring the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Derek de Solla Price and Vasilij Vasilevich Nalimov were the originators of the discipline, which they developed for the purpose of providing research tools to historians and sociologists of science. However, it was only with the advent of the tools developed by the Institute for Scientific Information (now Thomson ISI) and the research conducted by its founder, Eugene Garfield, that the use of bibliometrics became widespread. With their systematic archiving of articles from a selection of some of the most prestigious and most often cited scholarly journals, the Thomson ISI databases considerably reduce the effort required to carry out bibliometric analysis. This partly explains why there has been a marriage of interest between ISI and the bibliometric community and why the most commonly used databases in bibliometric analyses are by far the ones produced by Thomson ISI. It must also be stated that ISI production process, although not always as transparent as the bibliometrician would like it to be, is fairly well documented. Established scholars select the journals to be covered in cooperation with users, publishers and members of editorial boards. Selection criteria include publication frequency, compliance with international presentation conventions, and a peer review committee. ISI's databases are particularly useful for a number of reasons (see Katz and Hicks, 1998, among others): • Their primary advantage is coverage. They cover all research fields, giving ready access to aggregated data. Unlike a number of other databases, which may cover some journals only in part (depending on the relevance of an article to singlediscipline databases, for example), these databases systematically index all articles and other items in the selected journals. Nearly 10,000 existing learned journals are covered (Katz and Hicks, 1998). • The criterion for including a journal in SCI and SSCI is the number of citations it receives. Because citations are perceived to be an indicator of interest and recognition on the part of scholars, the citation count is considered as evidence of the usefulness, quality and/or impact of a journal. According to Eugene Garfield, 90– 95% of the most frequently cited articles in the natural sciences are published in a core group of about 2000 journals (CNER, 2002, citing Garfield, 1996). However, it is noteworthy that AHCI inclusion criteria are more subjective. According to Thomson ISI: Publishing standards, including timeliness, are also important in the evaluation of Arts and Humanities journals. Citations in the Arts and Humanities, however, do not necessarily follow this same predictable pattern as citations to Social Sciences and Natural Sciences articles. Citations to an article on the 19th Century Romantic novel, for example, may accrue slowly at first, and then slacken, fluctuating over time in cycles consistent with scholars' varying interest in the topic. In addition, Arts and Humanities journal articles reference non-journal sources heavily (e.g., books, musical compositions, works of art and literature). Consequently, citation data, while sometimes useful, are frequently much less so in journal evaluations in the Arts and Humanities. Arts & Humanities journals are selected by the primary editor with the support of the subject experts from the ISI Arts & Humanities indexing staff. The goal is the collection of superb Arts and Humanities content that reflects the complex nature of cultural phenomena across a broad range of fields. http://www.isinet.com/essays/selectionofmaterialforcoverage/199701.html/ • The Thomson ISI databases contain the institutional addresses for all authors of a given article. Other databases usually contain only the address of the first-named author. Without a complete address list, the analysis of collaboration research analysis is impossible. • Only the Thomson ISI databases contain citation information, which makes it possible to measure research impact. In the opinion of Katz and Hicks, this attribute alone justifies using these databases as science policy and research management tools. The Thomson ISI databases, like all databases used for scientometric evaluation, also have limits. These will affect the validity of bibliometric evaluation in both the NSE and the SSH. The main problems with research publication databases comprise (CNER, 2002): • limited coverage; • exclusion of certain types of documents; • classification of journals by discipline; • changes in journal titles; • different individual authors with identical names (homographs); • unequal distribution of work among authors which might not be reflected; • negative and erroneous citations, self-citation and personal strategies. Another disadvantage is that they are relatively costly to use (Katz and Hicks, 1998). Since bibliometrics is generally based on the use of bibliographic databases, all the above factors reduce the reliability of bibliometric research evaluation. These problems are common to most the databases and reflect the limitations of compiling and indexing academic journals and articles. But scientometric analyses may also be affected negatively by some practices and situations specific to the field concerned. This is exactly the case with the SSH, as can be seen in the following section. SSH are not NSE According to Line (1999), most social sciences can be described as “relatively young, and scarcely organized as coherent disciplines.” He suggests that the SSH are fragmented because they do not have international standards for rigorously defining concepts. Terms 0.1% topic match

0.1%

1.2

2020

[85] Creating Restful APIs over SPARQL endpoints with RAMOSE Marilena Daquino, ..., and D. Shotton ArXiv 2020 - 5 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

25.5

2023

[86] The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges Leigh-Ann Butler, ..., and Stefanie Haustein Quantitative Science Studies 2023 - 27 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

2.1

2024

[87] Acceso abierto en Argentina. Una propuesta para el monitoreo de las publicaciones científicas con OpenAlex Carolina Unzurrunzaga, ..., and Juan Pablo Alperin Información, cultura y sociedad 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

8.7

2022

[88] The oligopoly’s shift to open access publishing Leigh-Ann Butler, ..., and S. Haustein Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI 2022 - 20 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2024

[89] Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis M. Sharp, ..., and Barbara Clyne HRB Open Research 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite Abstract: Background Scientific publications have been growing exponentially, contributing to an oversaturated information environment. Quantifying a research output’s impact and reach cannot be solely measured by traditional metrics like citation counts as these have a lag time and are largely focused on an academic audience. There is increasing recognition to consider ‘alternative metrics’ or altmetrics to measure more immediate and broader impacts of research. Better understanding of altmetrics can help researchers better navigate evolving information environments and changing appetites for different types of research. Objectives Our study aims to: 1) analyse the amount and medium of Altmetric coverage of health research produced by Irish organisations (2017 – 2023), identifying changes over time and 2) investigate differences in the amount of coverage between clinical areas (e.g., nutrition vs. neurology). Methods Using Altmetric institutional access, we will gather data on research outputs published 1 January 2017 through 31 December 2023 from active Irish organisations with Research Organisation Registry (ROR) IDs. Outputs will be deduplicated and stratified by their Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification relating to ≥1 field of health research: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Health Sciences, and Psychology. We will clean data using R and perform descriptive analyses, establishing counts and frequencies of coverage by clinical area and medium (e.g., traditional news, X, etc.); data will be plotted on a yearly and quarterly basis where appropriate. Results and Conclusions Improved understanding of one’s information environment can help researchers better navigate their local landscapes and identify pathways for more effective communication to the public. All R code will be made available open-source, allowing researchers to adapt it to evaluate their local landscapes. 0.1% topic match

0.1%

2.1

2023

[90] Sustainable Development and Tourism: A Review of the Literature in WoS from 2001 to 2020 Alma Rocío García-García, ..., and Sacnicté Valdez-del Río Sustainability 2023 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

11.6

2007

[91] Citation Analysis: A Comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science Kiduk Yang and Lokman I. Meho ASIS&T Annual Meeting 2007 - 199 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

0.1%

None

[92] study of the scientific production on music education in Spain (1978–2022) Estudio bibliométrico de la producción científica de educación musical en España (1978-2022) PhD. Gregorio VICENTE-NICOLÁS, ..., and Molina de Segura Journal Not Provided None - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2024

[93] A persistent gender pay gap among faculty in a public university system Lanu Kim, ..., and Sebastian Munoz-Najar Galvez Scientific Reports 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2020

[94] Identifying the Right Person in Social Networks with Double Metaphone Codes Joshua D. Hamilton, ..., and S. Singh 2020 IEEE Intl Conf on Parallel & Distributed Processing with Applications, Big Data & Cloud Computing, Sustainable Computing & Communications, Social Computing & Networking (ISPA/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom) 2020 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

2.1

2024

[95] Trends and Issues of Inquiry and Socio-Scientific Issue (SSI) Research in the Last 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis M. Noris, ..., and S. Yamtinah International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

3.6

2022

[96] Assessing the quality of bibliographic data sources for measuring international research collaboration B. Nguyen, ..., and V. Larivière Quantitative Science Studies 2022 - 8 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.8

2022

[97] Academic Tracker: Software for tracking and reporting publications associated with authors and grants P. T. Thompson, ..., and H. Moseley PLOS ONE 2022 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: In recent years, United States federal funding agencies, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF), have implemented public access policies to make research supported by funding from these federal agencies freely available to the public. Enforcement is primarily through annual and final reports submitted to these funding agencies, where all peer-reviewed publications must be registered through the appropriate mechanism as required by the specific federal funding agency. Unreported and/or incorrectly reported papers can result in delayed acceptance of annual and final reports and even funding delays for current and new research grants. So, it’s important to make sure every peer-reviewed publication is reported properly and in a timely manner. For large collaborative research efforts, the tracking and proper registration of peer-reviewed publications along with generation of accurate annual and final reports can create a large administrative burden. With large collaborative teams, it is easy for these administrative tasks to be overlooked, forgotten, or lost in the shuffle. In order to help with this reporting burden, we have developed the Academic Tracker software package, implemented in the Python 3 programming language and supporting Linux, Windows, and Mac operating systems. Academic Tracker helps with publication tracking and reporting by comprehensively searching major peer-reviewed publication tracking web portals, including PubMed, Crossref, ORCID, and Google Scholar, given a list of authors. Academic Tracker provides highly customizable reporting templates so information about the resulting publications is easily transformed into appropriate formats for tracking and reporting purposes. The source code and extensive documentation is hosted on GitHub (https://moseleybioinformaticslab.github.io/academic_tracker/) and is also available on the Python Package Index (https://pypi.org/project/academic_tracker) for easy installation. 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

2.3

2020

[98] Analytics of Similar-Sounding Names from the Web with Phonetic Based Clustering S. Singh, ..., and Joshua D. Hamilton 2020 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) 2020 - 9 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

2.5

2019

[99] Le français, langue seconde ? De l'évolution des lieux et langues de publication des chercheurs au Québec, en France et en Allemagne Vincent Larivière Recherche 2019 - 14 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

2.8

2024

[100] How to measure interdisciplinary research? A systemic design for the model of measurement G. Cantone Scientometrics 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

32.1

2020

[101] Value and benefits of model‐based systems engineering (MBSE): Evidence from the literature Kaitlin Henderson and A. Salado Systems Engineering 2020 - 125 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

12.7

2020

[102] Academic Knowledge Production and the Global South Márton Demeter https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52701-3 2020 - 62 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2024

[103] Dataset for bibliometric data-driven research team formation: Case of Politehnica University of Timisoara scholars for the interval 2010–2022 Christian-Daniel Curiac, ..., and A. Doboli Data in Brief 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

2.3

2024

[104] Global Trends of Biofloc Research in the Aquaculture Sector: A Metadata Scientometric Analysis K. Anantharaja, ..., and P. Routray Journal of Coastal Research 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

2.2

2024

[105] biblioverlap: an R package for document matching across bibliographic datasets Gabriel Alves Vieira and J. Leta Scientometrics 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

3.2

2022

[106] La batalla de las lenguas en la publicación nacional: un estudio comparativo de las publicaciones del CNPq (Brasil) y Conicet (Argentina) Fernanda Beigel and L. Digiampietri Tempo Social 2022 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

6.3

2021

[107] Knowledge Graphs for COVID-19: An Exploratory Review of the Current Landscape A. Chatterjee, ..., and P. Lambin Journal of Personalized Medicine 2021 - 23 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2024

[108] Time to Publication in Medical Education Journals: An Analysis of Publication Timelines During COVID-19 (2019–2022) Lauren A. Maggio, ..., and TingLan Ma Perspectives on Medical Education 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

2024

[109] core_api_client: An API for the CORE aggregation service for open access papers Domen Vake, ..., and Jernej Vičič SoftwareX 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2023

[110] Effect of employee`s religious and cultural values on their sustainable behavior: A Systematic Approach to the Literature Salman Hameed and D. Siddiqui International Journal of Social Science & Entrepreneurship 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

0.0

2024

[111] Growth of Science and Women: Methodological Challenges of Using Structured Big Data Marek Kwiek and Lukasz Szymula Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

12.4

2019

[112] Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics A. Raan https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_10 2019 - 73 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.1%

0.0

2022

[113] Mapping Climate Change Research via Open Repositories & AI: advantages and limitations for an evidence-based R&D policy-making N. Bovenzi, ..., and Josep Pujol-Llatse ArXiv 2022 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.1% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.1%

3.7

2006

[114] Language Planning for International Scientific Communication: An Overview of Questions and Potential Solutions U. Ammon Current Issues in Language Planning 2006 - 70 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.1% topic match

0.0%

5.4

2020

[115] Facilitating the Analysis of COVID-19 Literature Through a Knowledge Graph Bram Steenwinckel, ..., and F. Ongenae International Workshop on the Semantic Web 2020 - 22 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

4.2

2020

[116] Special issue on bibliographic data sources L. Waltman and V. Larivière Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 20 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

7.6

2024

[117] Missing institutions in OpenAlex: possible reasons, implications, and solutions Lin Zhang, ..., and Ying Huang Scientometrics 2024 - 6 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.2

2023

[118] Document Types Indexed in WoS and Scopus: Similarities, Differences, and Their Significance in the Analysis of Publication Activity Yuliya Mokhnacheva Scientific and Technical Information Processing 2023 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2023

[119] BRAPCI Explorer Rafael Gutierres Castanha and Francielle Franco dos Santos RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação 2023 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.8

2023

[120] Open Access Bibliographic Resources for Maintaining a Bibliographic Database of Research Organization N. Mazov and V. Gureyev Scientific and Technical Information Processing 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2024

[121] Fully Automated Scholarly Search for Biomedical Systematic Literature Reviews Leandra Budau and F. Ensan IEEE Access 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

2.8

2023

[122] Context-aware citation recommendation of scientific papers: comparative study, gaps and trends Chaker Jebari, ..., and M. Cobo Scientometrics 2023 - 4 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

10.5

2022

[123] Rethinking English as a lingua franca in scientific-academic contexts Federico Navarro, ..., and Désirée Motta-Roth Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 2022 - 26 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

38.5

2019

[124] Web of Science and Scopus language coverage Miguel-Angel Vera-Baceta, ..., and K. Kousha Scientometrics 2019 - 197 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

3.4

2019

[125] Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication Nicky Agate The Idealis 2019 - 20 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

16.3

2015

[126] Scientific Babel: How Science Was Done Before and After Global English M. Gordin https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.193754 2015 - 157 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.7

2024

[127] Comparing Funder Metadata in OpenAlex and Dimensions Eric Schares OpenISU 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

3.2

2024

[128] Research and Trends of Filtration for Removing Microplastics in Freshwater Environments Marchel Putra Garfansa, ..., and Yenni Arista Cipta Ekalaturrahmah Environmental Quality Management 2024 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

19.3

2023

[129] Bibliometric Analysis: Bridging Informatics With Science. M. Lazarides, ..., and N. Papanas The international journal of lower extremity wounds 2023 - 35 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

1.2

2022

[130] As línguas e rankings no Oscar da internacionalização das produções científicas latino-americanas K. Finardi Estudos Linguísticos (São Paulo. 1978) 2022 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

0.0

2024

[131] Evolving interdisciplinary contributions to global societal challenges: A 50-year overview Keisuke Okamura Journal Not Provided 2024 - 0 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

4.9

2018

[132] How Unpaywall is transforming open science Holly Else Nature 2018 - 31 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

4.5

2024

[133] (Non-)retracted academic papers in OpenAlex Christian Hauschke and Serhii Nazarovets ArXiv 2024 - 3 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

6.4

2024

[134] Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information A. Editorial Science Editor and Publisher 2024 - 2 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

0.0%

8.9

2023

[135] The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing Thomas Klebel and Tony Ross-Hellauer Quantitative Science Studies 2023 - 16 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

1435.2

2021

[136] How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines Naveen Donthu, ..., and Weng Marc Lim Journal of Business Research 2021 - 4625 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

0.0%

7.8

2020

[137] Use of author identifier services (ORCID, ResearcherID) and academic social networks (Academia.edu, ResearchGate) by the researchers of the University of Caen Normandy (France): A case study C. Boudry and Manuel Durand-Barthez PLoS ONE 2020 - 33 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: The purpose of this paper was to assess the presence of researchers on two author identifier services (ORCID and ResearcherID) and to compare the results with two academic social networks (Academia.edu and ResearchGate) using the categories of discipline, career advancement, and gender in a medium sized multidisciplinary university in France (University of Caen Normandy). Metrics such as number of publications per researcher, h-indexes, and average number of citations were also assessed. Of the 1,047 researchers studied, 673 (64.3%) had at least one profile on the four sites, and the number of researchers having multiple profiles decreased as more sites were studied. Researchers with only one profile numbered 385 (36.8%), while 204 (19.5%) had two, 68 (6.5%) had three, and only 16 (1.5%) had four. ResearchGate had by far the highest number of researchers present, with 569 (54.3%), whereas presence on the other sites was about 15%. We found that, apart from Academia.edu, researchers in Sciences, Technology, and Medicine (STM) were over-represented. Overall, experienced male researchers were over-represented on the sites studied. Our results show that, because of the numerous profiles lacking publication references (particularly on ORCID) and a low presence of researchers on the four sites studied (except for ResearchGate), assessing the number of publications, h-indexes, or average number of citations per article of individuals or institutions remains challenging. Finally, our data showed that French researchers have not adopted the use of the two author identifier sites (i.e. ORCID and ResearcherID). As long as French researchers remain reticent, these sites will not be able to provide the services for which they were created: addressing the problem of author misidentification, consequently providing exhaustive access to scientific production and bibliometric indicators of individual researchers and their institutions. 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

0.8

2023

[138] Connecting with Future Talent: A Review of Employer Value Propositions and Digital Media Channels for Sustainable Companies Targeting Generations Y and Z J. Teori, ..., and Kristia Jurnal Manajemen Teori dan Terapan | Journal of Theory and Applied Management 2023 - 1 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF Abstract: Objective: This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the employer value proposition of ethical and sustainable companies and the effective digital media channels that sustainable companies can use to attract and communicate with Generation Y and Z candidates. Design/Methods/Approach: The PRISMA systematic literature review method was combined with content analysis of selected articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The selected articles were limited to those published within the last six years and in English. Findings: This study found that sustainable companies need to offer a corporate value proposition that prioritizes clear career progression, work-life balance, a supportive work atmosphere, and ethical aspects, such as reducing carbon footprint and promoting diversity and inclusion. These values are essential to Generations Y and Z, although the priority dimensions of their value propositions may differ. Companies utilize Digital media channels, including owned digital media, paid digital media by using paid endorsers or enhanced profiles on career websites, and earned digital media such as honest reviews on job board platforms and private social media from employees. Originality/Value: This review adds to the existing literature by comprehensively discussing the combined issues of employer value proposition, generational differences, and sustainability. Practical/Policy implication: This review's findings have implications for business and research practice, as sustainable companies can use this information to develop the most relevant corporate value propositions and communication strategies for future targeted talent. Companies can attract and retain top personnel and establish a positive employer brand by effectively communicating their sustainability practices and values. Additional empirical research could investigate the impact of other demographic and psychographic factors on the preferences and priorities of job seekers. 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

92.4

2020

[139] Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic M. Visser, ..., and L. Waltman Quantitative Science Studies 2020 - 416 citations - Show abstract - Cite - PDF 0.0% topic match

✅ Show detailed summary of full text

0.0%

15.4

2010

[140] Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar Jie Li, ..., and R. Britton Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries 2010 - 219 citations - Show abstract - Cite 0.0% topic match

Research topic

Report

References

Select the format you want to download:

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS

Download Citations

Citation Text

BibTeX

RIS